GuyGadebois wrote:...
And you ? Aside from throwing around the same lies you learned in the 60s over and over and over again and kneeling down to what you call "science" (aka corruption, business, marketing, mess)
Funny, the declinist who uses science, processors, a screen, electronics, networks, multinationals managing networks, all to tell us about this forum that people would no longer be interested in science.
It doesn't surprise me, ecology is a science, but we have rarely seen an environmentalist interested in it. For him this is only a useful pretext for his backward fight for economic regression and the Malthusianism that goes hand in hand.
without realizing that the world has changed and aspires to something other than your technophile program, what are you bringing to the debate? NOTHING. NEVER. Even your positions towards the climate are irrelevant, since you ardently defend those who disturb it.
Science was never made to make people happy. You have to be rather limited to have believed it, and obviously those who believed it end up coming back and attacking it, as if it was the cause of their stupidity. Science is knowledge. It gives us power over the world so it can promote material well-being, not happiness, solve lots of concrete problems, for which societies favor it. It can also create it but with a benefit / harm ratio in its favor, except to claim that living only 40 years, dying of tuberculosis or living disabled for life by polio, was an enviable situation compared to today. But there are some of those haves who complain about the climate which does not bother them in any way to live and, the icing on the cake, who would have been unable to imagine the existence of global warming if the science that they castigate hadn't told them! And now they are making their spokespersons! At this point of incomprehension or hypocrisy, it leaves you speechless.