GuyGadebois wrote:Moindreffor wrote:I think you really believe that all researchers are devoid of ethics and that they are ready to camouflage the dangers of this or that product that they invent just to make money, stop immediately, run for a rope and hang you
I wrote the exact opposite above. I even specified that it is the people who employ the researchers who are most of the time there only to make money. After, yes, even among researchers there are bastards, like everywhere. I spoke of corruption made possible by the laws that promote these practices. The most recent are those which allow private groups to attack democracies which take decisions which do not suit them.
Do you think that researchers are too absorbed in their research not to realize what is done with their work?
do you think that a researcher who would invent bastards would say nothing if the company he works for would sell it?
and so do you think that researchers are doing research to find toxic products which could harm the human species?
Do you think that researchers are so unconscious as to continue on a research path knowing that it will be harmful?
science has made mistakes, but it has learned from these mistakes, and is doing everything not to reproduce them
So when we say that there is a consensus of researchers on the non-dangerousness of GMOs, do you think that they say it to please their employers and that they are all corrupt or because they really mean it?