GMOs good for health

[GuyGadebois]

...

100% of your answer is false, it has been demonstrated many times on Econologie. Why are you coming back with your loaded documents?

[Janic]

Your usual comparison to play on fears makes no sense.

Ouuaarf! Fear and caution are two different things, but you don't seem to know how to do it.
For example the current corona which requires hygienic precautions by Prudence to avoid precisely the fear panic that would cause an explosion of cases without these precautions. Have you seen the difference?

GMOs bt, almost everyone has used them for a long time, except Europe in general and France in particular.

So not everyone actually!
Monsanto and co apply the same methods with their agrochemicals as BP did with medical petrochemicals. Invade developing countries and defile as soon as side effects appear en masse.
To give the impression of a great immediate effectiveness, without taking into account its possible consequences (DDT type) on the following generations whose lawyers, largely paid, make the trials of the victims last or who give them alms so that they are silent.

As far as I know, no one is detonating a nuclear bomb and no one is disputing the potential devastation.

This is what we say until it explodes like Chernobyl and Fukushima. who did not blow them up on purpose unlike Hiroshima and Nagasaki but whose end result was the same. However, you cannot in any way assert that this will not happen (in terms of GMOs, let's not lose track of it) in the decades to come and that it will not start again as with DDT.

[Gébé]

you cannot in any way assert that this will not happen (in terms of GMOs, let's not lose track of it) in the decades to come.

Yep .... it's been decades already !!!! And still nothing .....

[Janic]

Yep .... it's been decades already !!!! And still nothing .....

when you don't look in the right place, or at the right time you don't see anything, obviously It takes just a little patience and big money to update its pernicious effects and it is not BP that will pay them. like that:
https://www.letemps.ch/sciences/ddt-lin ... ant-mortel

[Moindreffor]

==> There is a beneficial halo around GMO Bt crops! Bt GMOs also protect neighboring non-GMO crops, even organic crops.
==> By observing the use of pesticides and the preserved biodiversity, we can consider that Bt GMOs are ecological.
Bt GMOs reduce the use of insecticides

ah, ah, ah! atomic bombs are also supposed to protect countries, without them, from war and destruction (let's remember from cuba and the atomic threat of the two big blocks) except when it becomes Hiroshima or Nagasaki and Chernobyl. As long as all is well, we praise a product and when it turns sour the big mouths who sang the praises are silent and hide under the carpet.

still one of your big bullshit
if you really followed History and Geopolitics you would have known for a long time that the Japanese have long recognized that the two bombings by accelerating the end of the war, saved a lot of people, much more than the deaths caused by these bombings
therefore a largely positive human toll

so yes, thanks to the nuclear bombs that saved many japanese people, you would have preferred what, 2 or 3 times more conventional deaths, with ordinary bombs, ordinary bullets, you have to have a narrow mind to think that a death by l atom is more harmful than 2 or 3 per conventional weapon

still as low as the Janic

[realistic ecology]

piped documents

Documents from Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine - INRA ... When we don't want to know ... we accuse the dog of having rabies.

[Moindreffor]

Your usual comparison to play on fears makes no sense.

Ouuaarf! Fear and caution are two different things, but you don't seem to know how to do it.
For example the current corona which requires hygienic precautions by Prudence to avoid precisely the fear panic that would cause an explosion of cases without these precautions. Have you seen the difference?

GMOs bt, almost everyone has used them for a long time, except Europe in general and France in particular.

So not everyone actually!
Monsanto and co apply the same methods with their agrochemicals as BP did with medical petrochemicals. Invade developing countries and defile as soon as side effects appear en masse.
To give the impression of a great immediate effectiveness, without taking into account its possible consequences (DDT type) on the following generations whose lawyers, largely paid, make the trials of the victims last or who give them alms so that they are silent.

As far as I know, no one is detonating a nuclear bomb and no one is disputing the potential devastation.

This is what we say until it explodes like Chernobyl and Fukushima. who did not blow them up on purpose unlike Hiroshima and Nagasaki but whose end result was the same. However, you cannot in any way assert that this will not happen (in terms of GMOs, let's not lose track of it) in the decades to come and that it will not start again as with DDT.

What does the European population represent compared to the world? compare comparable things, it is not the refusal of GMOs in France that will stop GMOs in the world, in addition GMOs for animals yes, GMOs for humans no, while precisely the corona that you quote, it is a passage from the animal to the Man by the fact that the Man eats the animal, so if we were logical until the end if we accepted GMOs for animals we should accept them for Man, but it is electoralism, the population does not want it because a handful of zozo, clubbing catastrophic speeches by playing precisely on the fear of the greatest number, how many Gugusse have made their butter with books on the end of the world...

[GuyGadebois]

piped documents

Documents from Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine - INRA ... When we don't want to know ... we accuse the dog of having rabies.

Pissed, indeed.
INRA: Zero Trust, Obsolete Document (2012)
The other references are blurred, outdated and not found. Try again.

[Moindreffor]

Yep .... it's been decades already !!!! And still nothing .....

when you don't look in the right place, or at the right time you don't see anything, obviously It takes just a little patience and big money to update its pernicious effects and it is not BP that will pay them. like that:
https://www.letemps.ch/sciences/ddt-lin ... ant-mortel

well then instead of spending big pennies to make disinformation your opposition associations, should spend a little to bring to light its dangerous effects, but when there is nothing to find and that it know perfectly well we are definitely not going to look
it would be stupid to prove yourself that you were wrong

[Moindreffor]

piped documents

Documents from Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine - INRA ... When we don't want to know ... we accuse the dog of having rabies.

Pissed, indeed.

so here it is so easy to say, do you have any evidence that INRA is piping up its results? because if it is, then you write a book and you are sure to win one or more prizes, if not, pass your turn

I am still waiting to see on the front page of the 20 p.m. the great humanitarian catastrophe announced caused by GMOs, on animals, because with them there is hindsight ...