by Rust COHLE » 04/12/20, 15:14
Hello everyone, being new to the forum on the advice of Mr. HELMSTETTER, I wanted to thank you for the amount of knowledge and feedback that I have been able to read so far.
I stumbled across the videos and books of the PP of the PP last spring and I will apply myself to testing the phenoculture in a few days by placing the hay in a layer of 20 cm on my vegetable garden of a hundred of m2 which for about fifteen years was motocultured by my grandfather who incorporated ewe manure and used Bordeaux mixture, then my father for 2 years continued the garden and manure only, and these last two years only used a campaign without any input.
Having cross-checked the information on the said media with other knowledge that I was able to mobilize, I am at this time convinced of the method on the theoretical level in particular of the interest of hay and its multiple services, I could thus to confront myself with the practice in the coming years.
A big thank you, sincere and genuine, addressed to Did67 who, thanks to his books, videos, articles, positions, trials, errors and successes, takes us not on the path of a revealed truth but on the path of a ample breathing to open our minds to questioning and curiosity.
Regarding my first comment in this discussion, it seemed important to tell you what my situation was, in particular by sending you the results of my soil analyzes carried out by LABOSOL last month in order to inform my future interventions.
If by any chance you had the time and the opportunity to give me your advice, I would be grateful to you.
Maybe some questions about these analyzes that have not yet received answers from the lab:
1 °) The grain size indicates a clear “sandy-silty” tendency and it is indicated “sandy-clay”, is this an error?
2 °) It is indicated a saturation of the CEC by calcium while the level of calcium itself is a little low? Are they the same?
3 °) A lower limit zinc level can be explained by what factor?
4 °) There is no upper limit for sulfur, what do you think?
5 °) In the comment it is indicated that there is a risk of excess water while my clay content is only 11%, do you find that normal?
6 °) Am I far from the "freehold" which many speak?
7 °) Having a fairly deep soil, at least more than one meter, I calculated my RU by taking into account 25% of pebbles over 1 m at about 1,26 mm of water / cm of soil, my RFU being therefore about 22,25 l / m2 for a depth of 0,20m by applying the rate of 0,66, while the lab finds 26,27, the difference is not significant but how to explain it?
Do you find that this water reserve is in a good average? Even if I do not have data on the ETP and the ETR of my region in climate that I could qualify as "Mediterranean-mountain".
I heard about a new earthquake in Strasbourg, no damage to the PP of the PP and to the PP?
What can I say except that thank you in advance if only for taking the time to have read so far.
"Efficiency is intelligent laziness"
-
Attachments
-
- GRANULOMETRIE.jpeg (61.93 KiB) Viewed 1053 times
-
- ELEMENTS.jpeg (261.97 KiB) Viewed 1053 times
-
- COMMENTS.jpeg (205.95 KiB) Viewed 1053 times
0 x