Hello.
I find the universe of living soil fascinating, which I discover with the sloth technique. It is clear that the life and structure of the soil is a subject totally unknown to the general public (and many farmers ...). In any case, personally, it almost makes me regret not having chosen agronomy studies
But to fully understand the approach, there is still one point that remains a little confused in my mind, despite several hammock sessions: I try to understand what we are giving up (disadvantages but also advantages?) To have ideas clear. Basically, being able to explain and argue brings a lot of new questions, and shows that my understanding remains superficial. In short, I put it in writing here, it's part of the synthesis work:
The home has gone from a simple scraping of the soil with its artery - I would say a "mechanical surface furnishing" which cleans a little and facilitates sowing, in modern agriculture I would say that is more or less what the cultivator with its straight teeth on leaf springs, good with 500hp which pulls instead of a donkey. The home is therefore passed to
plow. Hence the question: what mechanism makes plowing efficient (in the short term, with negative effects in the long term)?
Little all about
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Labour:
"Its main advantage is to bring up the clay-humic colloids and mineral salts buried by the infiltration of water, which improves the structure of the soil, its permeability, and prevents the depletion of the soil's mineral resources. in a way, it speeds up the work of the earthworms which themselves perform a quarter of the plowing "
If I understand correctly, the idea is to bring to the surface the fertile elements which have "too" (?) Infiltrated, and which will then be able to benefit the new seedlings. So if I understand correctly, we will try to extract "even more" from a soil that is already rich in depth, to promote short-term productivity. Plowing also makes it possible to (artificially) aerate the soil and to force organic matter into it (spreading, in Brittany, we know well) which then benefits from a large contact surface with the soil thus oxygenated for decompose better - not sure that the living beings of the soil thus moved / massacred appreciate, but at least the bacteria, with their explosive growth, must be able to get by. The worms which "
provide a quarter of the plowing"must have a rather different opinion
So in summary, plowing allows the forceps to be injected with fertility elements, but with the disregard of the soil's capacity to organize itself naturally to make plants resilient, via underground collaborations. We are, it seems to me, in the logic of "the plant is a root soaked in an NPK soup". And it necessarily works a little too. At least in the short term before a big storm which takes 20cm on the whole plot
This is where I am, it remains a little confused, so I am interested in your reflection on the subject to clarify my ideas and prepare for questions from those around me - two friends, themselves farmers, who are intrigued by this. Like what...