Did67 wrote:Adrien (ex-nico239) wrote:
It seemed to me that 50l balanced in a few seconds with the jet benefited the plant less (especially on non-flat ground) than the same amount in drip or in this form of necklaces with slow diffusion
Or with the drain buried. In short, anything that prevents it from flowing (indeed, in the event of a slope) and which brings water deep rather than in width at the surface, will reduce losses and increase water efficiency. There is no debate.
Afterwards, these collars, oyas, buried drains, or drippers (in arid regions of Spain, there are often buried networks with a crown of drippers around the trees), that does not change much. Each manufacturer will have the arguments to say that his system is the best. And the sores will have their belief (inevitably, the oyas, an "ancestral" technique, used by the Indians I do not know how in the arid desert of Arizona, it throws! Like smoking peyote! So in memory of the Indians, we buy this 50 € each with our eyes closed and we smoke ...)
In fact, chance wanted Hogdson to make a subject on that same day.
Personally it is rather the slow diffusion watering (whatever the method) that I find relevant.
And in this specific case, my faith, it seems very lazy because the job of watering with the hose from the trees distant from several tens of meters is a bit ...
and since it’s me who pats me.Berf I just spent no later than today € 200 at Weldom to water the 12 young trees scattered out of the fenced area with a "Y" system so I tell myself that one in the other ...
But hey it's done it's done ... already with a hose on each side I will be cheaper ...
