Did67 wrote:... "gives himself the obligation" ... I would not say that;
Let's say I like to speak clearly. And do not hide possible criticism, convinced that I am that nothing is ever perfect. So just turn the part over, to see any drawbacks. On which I explain. What choices I make. Or I place my sliders. Why. Etc ...
Obviously, suddenly, phenoculture is no longer neither “revolutionary”, nor “sensational”, nor “incredible” [so much the better, I always wonder why something that is unbelievable attracts the world so much!] .. It's just a "good compromise", one that satisfies me.
drinking water catchment area, 300m from my home, each year, the hay is cut, put in round bale
and rotten on the spot until the moment when I do not know who comes to remove them, and we can see this quite regularly in different places, in my corner, I will say that the hay is not a resource which is in shortage, so it don't think of it as removing hay from animals
for some regions with a large deficit I would not say the same thing, but since farmers are not crazy either if they do not have enough for their animals, they should not sell them
otherwise, as there are many private horses, and these same private individuals often find it difficult to get rid of horse manure, it is a good way for me to replace some of the hay, because beware, horses do not digest not all the seeds and the horse manure without hay on top of it is like sowing meadows, my neighbor paid the price, hey he motorcycles
I think that when you want to criticize something negatively, you always find arguments, even if these arguments are flawed or show great bad faith