Ahmed wrote:@ Moindreffor
Taking into account the advantage / disadvantage ratio is relevant in a particular, practical situation, which does not claim a "critical study of a complex system", but it is to condemn oneself to not understand the meaning of a technical element to inside this social totality within which it unfolds in a non-contingent (non-innocent) way.
relevant precisely if we extract ourselves from the social totality, with the presence of leaders who make decisions for the good of society, except that currently our leaders no longer work for the good of society but for their return to power, we are in what one of my mentors called a soft dictatorship, and therefore the right / left antagonism only exists to participate in the alternation of the leaders, not the politicians, and the one who presented himself like neither right nor left, gained the place but keep playing the same score
so currently, we tack according to the variations of opinions, hence the growing influence of social networks, America has just made a sad experience of it and is slowly waking up, when at home we start flirting with it, which shows our backlog of expertise
Ahmed wrote:On the contrary, ideology would be to take at face value the phenomena whose mere existence would be sufficient justification. To think that ideology exists only in ideas and not in phenomena produced by societies and to which they refer would be a very classic reasoning bias (in the sense of very widespread).
Whether ideology creates phenomena or whether phenomena create ideology it comes to the same thing and therefore it is irrelevant, because as you say it is the sufficient justification which is dangerous, and that is what it is. must fight
so a lot of big words, a lot of complexity, a lot of rhetoric, but in the end, everything that you write and that we have a hard time deciphering brings nothing, no solution, or answer that allows us to move forward
"you condemn yourself to a circularity of reasoning, since these categories only make sense within the system considered and refer only to it"
the scientific mind and reasoning are there to extract us from this circle, except that by dint of making morons and frightening them we have succeeded in locking the circle well, the soft dictatorship has a bright future ahead of it, if it be careful not to shift too much the relationship between pedagogy and demagoguery