Blow against bio-dynamics

[Janic]

Ecology is indeed a science.

which obviously you ignore everything!

Environmentalism on the other hand is a low quasi-religious policy of the same assholes who made communism, the extreme left or the FN, their profile has been recycled. Like almost all policies, they are zero in science, especially in ecology.

thank you for supporting what is being said about policies and their current pseudo-health decisions on covid ... empty!

But anything that opposes the current society and can penalize it, is for them good to take. Oppose consumption, cars, agriculture, plastics, energy, industries, imports ...

in short everything that destroys this planet

by brandishing ecology and their monopoly of saving the planet, it is their reason for living.

well, if opposite, the zozos who have no ecological conscience, had seized the first, the second would not dispute them!

Have we ever seen environmentalists lead by example with a different lifestyle choice?

And you?

Find new products that would win support?

clearly doing worse, that's the right solution!

No doubt, but they are so rare that they are seldom seen. Giving lessons and wanting to demolish everything for this or that is easy, there we see them everywhere. Build, much less.

build what, give concrete examples rather than staying in your little bourgeois comfort!
typical example of confusion confusion out of context / Any system, no matter how good it deviates at one time or another from its origin, it is in the scheme of things.
For centuries everyone did not care what would happen to life on earth (limited to a reduced geographical circle linked to the mode of transport and missing global information) With our modernity which brings together aggravating factors such as rampant overcrowding, plus the global means of communication that allow, within the hour; to know what is happening at the far end of the globe, a recent phenomenon, with its natural disasters which cause immense damage, this is what developed ecological awareness, which did not exist before because before everyone literally did not care! like that :

But anything that opposes the current society and can penalize it, is for them good to take. Oppose consumption, cars, agriculture, plastics, energy, industries, imports ...

Hands off my destructive consumer society, he said, it's not that bad, we can continue, to pollute, to break, to destroy shamelessly as long as it brings us immense financial benefits for us the rich, the haves!
Lost! you have to realize that the good times of waste are gradually disappearing at the rate of the societies and generations that are arriving and who fear, for their part, for their very dark future, left by the generations that preceded them.
It's not perfect, since it's human, but it's progressing in the right direction!

[Ahmed]

This Tryphonian diatribe smacks of theological quarrel! Profession of faith, anathemas, excommunications for offense of disbelief and even demonology (Green Khmer!), Nothing will be spared us ...
In reality, we see here opposing a perfectly nihilistic conception of the world, to another which presents itself as saving *, but which in reality only constitutes a new phase intended to come to support the old ** and to continue moreover. beautiful the destructive work by circumventing the limitations encountered by the old method. It is therefore a simple quarrel of the chapel between an "old" and the new: both are to be fought for the same reasons. Let's fight against political thanatology!

* By instrumentalizing legitimate reactions ...
** And not to replace them: the distribution of the two depending on the technical and economic state of progress of the region of the world considered ...

[Ahmed]

Erratum: it was necessary to read political thanatodynamie, as inverse symmetrical of the initial subject ...

[Moindreffor]

Ah okay, I understand better: You don't give a fuck that we screw up the planet, on the other hand you have some against ecology and environmentalists who do not react as you would like them to do. ..

still nothing understood, I'm fed up with our ecologists crying over bad subjects and not denouncing the "real" ones, they all want an electric car but do not denounce the ravages of rare earths exploitation, and for that we demonizes diesel, while the new diesel engines have made such advances that globally they must be greener, and therefore the fight should be against old diesel and for energy savings and not it is to push for consumption always more electricity since we drive without polluting with electricity so let's go with no limits ... just plant, plant and plant again and again wind turbines that beautify our landscapes and protect our coasts.

[Janic]

still nothing understood, I'm fed up with our ecologists crying over bad subjects and not denouncing the "real ones", they all want an electric car

in which bin did you go to get this? The green people are not FOR electric vehicles but FOR the reduction of pollution which is not the same thing. Electricity, wind power, solar panels, etc… are bastard substitute solutions, not substitute ideals. The best method is reduction at the source, namely overconsumption.

but do not denounce the ravages of the exploitation of rare earths, and for that we demonize the diesel, while the new diesel engines have made such advances that overall they must be greener, and therefore the fight should be against the old diesel and for energy savings and not it is to push for an ever increasing consumption of electricity since we drive without polluting with electricity so let's go without limit ... just plant, plant and plant again and more wind turbines which beautify our landscapes and protect our coasts.

Stupid once again! Each time we improve the diesel (initially planned by Diesel for vegetable oils not petroleum) we have at the same time improved the gasoline engines and the reduction of pollution only takes place with more means. in addition to sophisticated and expensive. It is a simple vicious cycle in itself. All energy systems are polluting and all green people know it very well!
As for the wind turbines that disfigure the landscape, it has always been disfigured by human achievements including cities and high monuments such as churches, hydroelectric dams, lighthouses, etc ... and today by skyscrapers or nuclear power plants , worse than wind turbines, and people got used to it as they do with those wind turbines and huge fields of polluting solar panels.

[izentrop]

A cool new blog https://cyril-dgnr.com/fr/consideration ... -generales

[izentrop]

Public service in all sauces...

[Janic]

izmentrop
Many cognitive biases exist and it is possible that a combination of these biases comes into play here.
The best known and not the least is the confirmation bias: we will tend to favor information going in our direction (i.e. in the direction of our beliefs).
The stork effect will make us confuse correlation with causality, two succeeding events are not necessarily linked.
The illusion of series will cause us to perceive coincidences in random events.
The only valid part of his speech is this. Except that it is applicable to everything and everyone as for the covid vaccine propaganda and others which the izmentor promotes/propaganda without any scientific proof precisely.= trash!

[Janic]

A cool new blog https://cyril-dgnr.com/fr/consideration ... -general

or rather a new blog full of pretensions downright screwed up. For example:

Note that homeopathy, although controversial, has never been effective

no more than vaccines in this case. No vaccine has, to date, proven any effectiveness and this is historically verifiable among the populations concerned.

Rudolf Steiner said it well during the Course for Farmers, “[…] for me this is what it is: the truths of the science of the mind are true by themselves. There is no need to prove their truth by other facts, by external methods. »

to understand this kind of formula, it is still necessary to have the spirit, which is seriously lacking in this zigoto

We will pass over the fact that these words look like the words of a preacher, according to Steiner, his words are true of themselves, so we should not test them.

another manifest amerie! Assuming that the above sentence was correctly translated, the author does not say MY words are true, but "the truths of the science of the mind are true by themselves" as hot is hot by itself since it is its very nature of being.

The question of the effectiveness of biodynamic agriculture has nevertheless been raised and investigated by the scientific community.

another stupid thought! Indeed, the terrestrial attraction, even investigated by the scientific community of its time, this one had not proven it, although it existed for as much. And that wants to appear scientific, like the pretensions, not proven by the scientific community, of the izmenteur.

[izentrop]

A fervent Steiner addict converted to zététique by a comic book, it's not common