moreover, if our laboratories can no longer finance their research, we will be totally dependent on other countries
Labs invest more money in marketing than in research; more, as the great Charles still said » we do not need researchers, but finders
And these are rare.
But with 1000 billion global turnover and a profit NET
, some of 25% who goes into the pockets of shareholders, we do not cry miserable fact that research is the poor relation of the pharmaceutical or agri-food chemical industry.
I know you think we can cure everything with 5 fruits and vegetables not days,
I do not think it comes from the government, not from me.
It's not that easy! The hit of 5 fruits and vegetables a day comes from the recognition that some diseases, including cancer, are largely due to free radicals and that these free radicals are being combated by these antioxidants found mainly in FRESH fruits and vegetables. This therefore has a reducing effect of the effects of these free radicals and therefore with a certain influence on these cancers.
But fortunately, this is only informative, not mandatory, because everyone is still free (theoretically) of his body.
I would also like to believe it,
It's not about loving or not. I guess you're not a love treatment of it, but because you're afraid to die, which is not the same thing and so you believe it, here veux
to believe it desperately.
Now to know if this or that thing (not only food) has any effectiveness on the state of health, it is not speeches that will advance the situation but putting them into practice
I have long believed in Santa Claus, little mice, Easter bells, in solidarity, in good faith, but I came back
Not really since you believe in Santa Claus of the sacrosanct miraculous conventional medicine.
Is another medicine better or worse? It's often only when the first leaves no hope that people desperate
turn to "charlatans" (sic) parallel medicine often too late elsewhere! [*] [*] A non-limiting example (because they are numerous) taken from my limited edition book, confidential and full of anecdotes, not the theory.Here is a two-and-a-half story.
Her little girl had leukemia. After many treatments, she was returned to them to spend her last moments in her family; that is to say the seriousness of his condition. Like all parents, they did not resolve to accept the inevitable and beat the drum to avoid this fatal outcome. They were given the name of a naturopath (you know the charlatans!) Who, given the state of the child, did not promise a result, but only to do his best. And against all odds, the child's health slowly improved. But the story does not end there. Social services came to visit the family to inquire about the child's health (or to offer their condolences?). Noting the improvement in her condition, they wanted to start treatment again and the parents had to leave their child to those who had previously got rid of it. Reprocessing, relapse, return to the family home. Back to the naturopath who reiterates his reservations: Re-improvement of the state of the child. The story could have stopped there, but there are cups to be drunk to the dregs. Again revisits social services that note the improvement of the child resumed their work, where they had interrupted, despite the protests of parents. The child could not stand this third aggression and died.
And I have others in reserve.
Another ?! Everyone has heard of Mességué https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maurice_M ... A9gu%C3%A9
What W does not say is that he was the subject of several lawsuits by the College of Physicians for the illegal practice of medicine. As he was treating celebrities around the world, he had hundreds of patients come back to health and he was amused by telling his accusers that at each trial, his celebrity increased and his clientele also and he thanked them for doing so. Clearly, this is not a label that is worth the therapy, but its effectiveness that it comes from a university graduate doctor or a charlatan who heals and heals, HE, what these learned doctors could not do.
you're in good health, you can believe that it's because of your lifestyle, but I've seen good living smokers make old bones, so I think we're more or less lucky at the base, and so for the less fortunate ben I hope we'll still have the opportunity to benefit research in our European countries,
Ah, the boat example! life depends on a multitude of individual, collective, environmental and genetic factors that act sometimes for the benefit of it (health) sometimes to the detriment of it (the disease). If it were so simple, there would have been no patients since the dawn of humanity. So I do not believe, I check every day by comparison with people of my age (already advanced) and other younger ones.
my work colleagues, throughout my professional career, called me doctor J, and asked for various tips to improve their lingering problems that their doctors were not able to cure and generally, with little in fact, this wavering health improved to their surprise (and this has nothing to do with the illegal practice of medicine since no remedy is recommended, but only behaviors that common sense should have made them adopt for a long time)
But to believe, naively, that it is only a question of turning one's thumbs until one finds the miracle cure that will allow the smoker to continue smoking, the drinker to drink, the puffer to eat with impunity, c is illusory and generally sanctioned by illness, suffering and finally death. It is not a question of luck, nor of bad luck, but of taking control of one's own life, and even more of that of subsequent generations.
we run millions to a guy of 20 years to hit a ball, just because he naturally has talent and we refuse to a guy from 40 who has studied for a long time and who has been searching for a long time to find, to reap the fruit of his work ...
When he finds something! It is not the type who mixes ingredients in a vial that returns the immense profits of the chemical industry, but shareholders who phagocyte, precisely, a better possible reward for a researcher.
it seems that it is because we can identify with the guy of 20 years, succeed without working much, without studying, on the other hand we easily criticize the graduates their intellectual superiority, well yes when we do the mass education we do not do quality, it's like growing our vegetables, we always come back to the problem of the culture of ignorance to establish a power, we must give a dream.
Excellent final example when we do mass agricultural culture, we do not make quality
" and so " we always come back to the problem of culture of ignorance to establish poweryou have to give a dream.
And suicides among conventional farmers.
But, you have a particular vision of success that would only be in the money, there are much more important things in life and given your situation I guess it allows you to reconsider these "values". Because even millionaires or billionaires die like all the others and often of these diseases which do not make of financial racism, but of which they would like to be exempted with all the money that they have that allows them to reach the greatest specialists of the world and the most sophisticated therapies, for the same result: a small oak box.
[*] In VGL these 5 fruits and vegetables are the basis of their diet and therefore we meet very rarely or not at all in some schools of thought and action, these pathologies.
[*] [*] Again, there is an ethical problem. Should a "charlatan" take charge of an individual close to death to try to avoid this fatal outcome, knowing that if the individual dies, it is his charlatanism that will be condemned (by relatives and the order doctors, too happy to finally find A victim of these alternative medicines) and if he gets out of it, it will be invoked that it is the previous treatment which has acted with delay.
"We do science with facts, as is a house with stones, but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a heap of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
"Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence" Exnihiloest