We can also see what the differences in ground level give (yellow arrows clear outlines)Did67 wrote:Macro wrote:It would be interesting to know where this photo was taken .... The place may very well have been the theater of bombings during one of the last two wars .... It leaves traces for a long time .... Especially in open fields
But the other bare fields, at the top of the image, do not have any ... Such precise bombardments on agricultural plots, which stop dead at the limit, I do not believe much ... Without speaking that, on the other hand, it is always seen in the form of slight bowls ...
Which does not have the same rendering at all for what I suppose to be “spots of cloud shadows” (blue circles) with faded spots with blurred outlines and absence of large contrasts compatible with the description I make of them. ,
The contrast with the green field speaks volumes. Because in this case, unlike “cloud spots”, the shadows cast on the field accentuate the relief by indicating the subsidence of the ground in a marked way.
which is only true in one place in the yellow field, where there is indeed a difference in relief (black arrow) with a drop shadow (yellow arrow) => CQFD.
- BD292588-3084-43DD-AB33-D406D40E8005.jpeg (394.51 KiB) Viewed 1701 times
Such dark brown areas with blurred outlines, with therefore no signature of a change in relief below, I do not believe either. I think that the most misleading in all of this (which prevents being categorical) is the scale of the spots VS the scale of the distance, combined with the altitude. The spots are still pretty big when you get virtually close to the ground
so I can no longer find the message in question. It's really fb shit to find an info!
