Moindreffor wrote:Biobombe wrote:Yes Miaos, it is not easy to program but not impossible, while avoiding the "gas factory".
I think you are looking for complicated where we can make it simple, it is true that we have more and more probes of all kinds, more and more efficient gear, opening up more and more possibilities and we are starting to dream...
use a sonar to measure the depth of the water while a simple polystyrene ball would have made a very good float coupled that to a detector and there was no more problem, or even a simple system of switches will and comes
I think that given the weight of the windows of Didier's frames, it is not the wind that will make them fly away but on the other hand it's this weight that you have to lift, after even without spending hours at the gym lifting cast iron, I think that with a jack we have all already lifted our car to change a wheel
So we have the choice to either lighten and it may fly away or leave heavy and adapt the lifting system
if we look at a 3D printer, we program the movements to within 0.12mm and yet the limit switch is secured by a simple push switch,
so indeed, we can try to manage in a very high technology way or to use a little more D system reinforced by technology ...
Keep your moral lessons: we don't try to make things complicated where simplicity would be possible.
Automating is not complicated when you have a minimum of knowledge and adapted gear.
Having a realistic project is not dreaming.
Didier's windows: ask him if they are not fixed by hinges. In this case, the second year physics course shows that you can lift heavy without a lot of force to apply. It certainly also has polycarbonate structures.
No one to my knowledge has spoken of sonar: see the forum on fishing.
A 3D printer is easily programmed to stop it before it reaches the end of its course.