GMOs good for health

Agriculture and soil. Pollution control, soil remediation, humus and new agricultural techniques.
User avatar
GuyGadebois
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6532
Registration: 24/07/19, 17:58
Location: 04
x 982

Re: GMOs good for health




View GuyGadebois » 29/06/20, 02:52

izentrop wrote:Ok, but it's not because Whiterue participated in zetetic circles, that zetetics espouses negationist theses, it fights them like any non-refutable belief. http://www.toupie.org/Dictionnaire/Zetetique.htm

Let her start by setting an example, then. Because your big idiot is still a pillar of the sect that has gone everywhere (on all the channels, in all the radios, even in Podium by Yann Moix ...) and also at the Dieudonné show when he had guest Faurisson ...
0 x
“It is better to mobilize your intelligence on bullshit than to mobilize your bullshit on intelligent things. (J.Rouxel)
"By definition the cause is the product of the effect". (Tryphion)
"360 / 000 / 0,5 is 100 million and not 72 million" (AVC)
izentrop
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 13835
Registration: 17/03/14, 23:42
Location: picardie
x 1547
Contact :

Re: GMOs good for health




View izentrop » 29/06/20, 09:13

GuyGadebois wrote:
izentrop wrote:Ok, but it's not because Whiterue participated in zetetic circles, that zetetics espouses negationist theses, it fights them like any non-refutable belief. http://www.toupie.org/Dictionnaire/Zetetique.htm

Let her start by setting an example, then = Anthropomorphism. Because your big con = ad personam attack, it is still a pillar of the sect = Anthropocentrism which went everywhere (on all the channels, on all the radios, even in Podium by Yann Moix ...) and also at the Dieudonné show when he invited Faurisson ... Sophism
You would have the jackpot permanently if we zetically dissected your comments. : Mrgreen:
0 x
User avatar
GuyGadebois
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6532
Registration: 24/07/19, 17:58
Location: 04
x 982

Re: GMOs good for health




View GuyGadebois » 29/06/20, 18:40

izentrop wrote:You would have the jackpot permanently if we zetically dissected your comments. : Mrgreen:

You always have the jackpot when you read your speeches, you are unbeatable ... er unbeatable. : Mrgreen:
0 x
“It is better to mobilize your intelligence on bullshit than to mobilize your bullshit on intelligent things. (J.Rouxel)
"By definition the cause is the product of the effect". (Tryphion)
"360 / 000 / 0,5 is 100 million and not 72 million" (AVC)
izentrop
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 13835
Registration: 17/03/14, 23:42
Location: picardie
x 1547
Contact :

Re: GMOs good for health




View izentrop » 20/07/20, 23:35

Hide that breast ... : Mrgreen:
one can wonder about the sudden resumption of this controversy, however largely outdated since the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of July 25, 2018. By specifying that all techniques of mutagenesis - and therefore also of cell fusion or polyploid induction - produce GMOs, some having the obligation to be regulated by Directive 2001/18 and others being exempt, -, the Court confirmed that many varieties cultivated in organic agriculture for years are indeed GMOs. A subject that supporters of organic agriculture fiercely try to hide from the general public https://www.agriculture-environnement.f ... -ble-renan
1 x
User avatar
GuyGadebois
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6532
Registration: 24/07/19, 17:58
Location: 04
x 982

Re: GMOs good for health




View GuyGadebois » 21/07/20, 19:02

Grotesque, as usual. : roll: And in addition we had already spoken ...
0 x
“It is better to mobilize your intelligence on bullshit than to mobilize your bullshit on intelligent things. (J.Rouxel)
"By definition the cause is the product of the effect". (Tryphion)
"360 / 000 / 0,5 is 100 million and not 72 million" (AVC)
User avatar
GuyGadebois
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6532
Registration: 24/07/19, 17:58
Location: 04
x 982

Re: GMOs good for health




View GuyGadebois » 21/07/20, 19:55

The :
agriculture / are bt-gmos-ecological-t16214-110.html? hilit = colchicine # p373062
And you come back to the charge with one of the most rotten agro-chemical-productivist pro GMO fundamentalist lobbyists in Belgium: Gil Rivière-Wekstein * .... poor Izy.

* http://terrefuture.blog.free.fr/index.p ... e-Wekstein
0 x
“It is better to mobilize your intelligence on bullshit than to mobilize your bullshit on intelligent things. (J.Rouxel)
"By definition the cause is the product of the effect". (Tryphion)
"360 / 000 / 0,5 is 100 million and not 72 million" (AVC)
User avatar
realistic ecology
Éconologue good!
Éconologue good!
posts: 208
Registration: 21/06/19, 17:48
x 61

Re: GMOs good for health




View realistic ecology » 22/07/20, 08:34

izentrop wrote: one can wonder about the sudden resumption of this controversy, however largely outdated since the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of July 25, 2018. By specifying that all techniques of mutagenesis - and therefore also of cell fusion or polyploid induction - produce GMOs, some having the obligation to be regulated by Directive 2001/18 and others being exempt, -, the Court confirmed that many varieties cultivated in organic agriculture for years are indeed GMOs. A subject that supporters of organic agriculture fiercely try to hide from the general public https://www.agriculture-environnement.f ... -ble-renan

More generally, one can also wonder about qualifying new varieties resulting from genetic engineering as GMOs, and only these. In reality, any new variety known as natural, or new variety known as GMO, is new because it has a new genome.
That is, any new variety is a Genetically Modified Organism. By definition :

Variety: Set of plants clearly identified by common morphological, physiological and genetic characters that distinguish them from other plants of the same species. (SPECIES AND VARIETY, WHAT DIFFERENCES? - GNIS - National Interprofessional Group of Seeds and Plants)

However, there are differences:

The new so-called natural varieties are obtained by crossing; the crossing matters in the variety of interest of the new, desired genes, but also an unknown number of unknown genes, with unknown properties. Seed companies thus offer hundreds of new so-called natural and doubtful varieties each year. There have been accidents.

The new varieties known as GMOs are obtained by precise methods allowing to add a known gene, with known effects, this one only. There was no accident.

The new varieties known as GMOs are less modified, better known, than the new varieties known as natural.
They are also better controlled.

New so-called natural and GMO varieties: what are the differences?
2 x
izentrop
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 13835
Registration: 17/03/14, 23:42
Location: picardie
x 1547
Contact :

Re: GMOs good for health




View izentrop » 22/07/20, 10:33

Excellent article, but you will attract the wrath of the "guy" with the "wooden" club : Wink:
1 x
User avatar
GuyGadebois
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6532
Registration: 24/07/19, 17:58
Location: 04
x 982

Re: GMOs good for health




View GuyGadebois » 22/07/20, 14:34

izentrop wrote:Excellent article ...

Just shit. : Mrgreen:
0 x
“It is better to mobilize your intelligence on bullshit than to mobilize your bullshit on intelligent things. (J.Rouxel)
"By definition the cause is the product of the effect". (Tryphion)
"360 / 000 / 0,5 is 100 million and not 72 million" (AVC)
User avatar
realistic ecology
Éconologue good!
Éconologue good!
posts: 208
Registration: 21/06/19, 17:48
x 61

Re: GMOs good for health




View realistic ecology » 22/07/20, 15:16

izentrop wrote:Excellent article, but you will attract the wrath of the "guy" with the "wooden" club : Wink:

No lightning strikes and blows, what matters are the arguments.
2 x

 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Back to "Agriculture: problems and pollution, new techniques and solutions"

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 137 guests