Janic wrote:least effort of reflection
well no need to study biodynamics, given the way you describe it, we understand that Steiner did not invent anything but that he took over the work of others and that he just added his mystical side, and that subsequently his disciples did the same
which would then show that mysticism is really effective, much more than a failed pseudo chemical rationalism!
you are absolutely right and that is what is currently dangerous, we are returning to obscurantism, pseudo-sciences and beliefs and people like you are delighted because it is all the fertile ground of manipulation of mass, there were the "big" religions, and we unfortunately see where religious extremism leads, now with the Internet we see rather small groups appearing that we can associate with sectarian excesses, which are just as dangerous, or even more because they are more and more numerous
lesser effort wrote:as you write it we understand that biodynamics is just putting a new "logo" on existing knowledge and more mystique for folklore, Steiner visionary in marketing yes
You are the typical example of the asshole who does not know anything about it and who takes refuge behind an obscurantism which would not be better in this case.
Otherwise, except for you who have the innate genius, the inventors only bring together already existing information to adapt them to situations where they allow a concrete use.
No one any longer disputes the visions of Leonardo da Vinci, inapplicable in his time for lack of suitable means and technologies, but in his time he passed
also for an enlightened man and it took 500 years for his genius, the real him, to be recognized and applied.
So do as ABCon returns to the doghouse! You may bark and drool your little quenottes do not impress anyone. [/ Quote]
it is you who tells us that Steiner did not invent anything, that he just took over as I highlighted in your message and you compare him to Leonardo da Vinci, nobody ever said that Leonardo had nothing invented and that he had taken over the work of others so your comparison is silly, even if we recognized the genius of Leonardo 500 years later he is indeed the original inventor, Steiner is only a buyer and it are you not the one writing it?
using nettle manure or other that's scientifically proven, and it works, and it's not biodynamics it's herbalism and herbalism is a science, that followers of biodynamics use also the herbalism and the one who speaks in the video, never speaks of biodynamics besides, on the other hand the fact that it is in organic and that it searches for alternative solutions is very good and like many, it is turns towards a science a real not a pseudo-science and it works and there I agree
after again and again multiple insults which once again shows your little spirit, low blows to try to cover up your own mistakes