Bacteriosol Marcel MEZY

[izentrop]

the drill can have very variable C / N ratios, I saw 25 in this document and it grows very well.
http://documents.irevues.inist.fr/bitst ... _479.pdf? S

Ha good! it grows very well under an umbrella pine

[humus]

A chamber of agriculture has tested this product: result https://pays-de-la-loire.chambres-agric ... _en_GC.pdf

They are obviously quite focused on yields, we can understand them and in the configurations tested the product does not show any advantage.

Without being able to say anything, one can always suspect lobbyism or the negative a priori behind this study.

In such a case, it is best to experiment yourself on a small scale.

[humus]

the drill can have very variable C / N ratios, I saw 25 in this document and it grows very well.
http://documents.irevues.inist.fr/bitst ... _479.pdf? S

Ha good! it grows very well under an umbrella pine

In upper Normandy?

[izentrop]

They are obviously quite focused on yields

and on the protein level, 2 important criteria which determine the rest.

one can always suspect lobbyism or the negative a priori behind this study.

Not at all since the tests were made against an untreated control.

in the configurations tested, the product does not show any advantage.

When you know that for a correct yield you need a contribution of 100 kg / ha of N for winter wheat, in their tests they put 300 kg / ha of bacteriosol at 2.7% of N, that amounts to bringing 8 kg / ha of N, we understand better https://comifer.asso.fr/index.php/fr/co ... icle-pages

[humus]

They are obviously quite focused on yields

and on the protein level, 2 important criteria which determine the rest.

one can always suspect lobbyism or the negative a priori behind this study.

Not at all since the tests were made against an untreated control.

in the configurations tested, the product does not show any advantage.

When you know that for a correct yield you need a contribution of 100 kg / ha of N for winter wheat, in their tests they put 300 kg / ha of bacteriosol at 2.7% of N, that amounts to bringing 8 kg / ha of N, we understand better https://comifer.asso.fr/index.php/fr/co ... icle-pages

Bacteriosol is not a fertilizer, we do not care about the content of this or that, it is a concentrate of living organisms to structure and care for the soil.
As said before, it is the equivalent of a microbiota transplant for a human.

For the impartiality of the chamber of agriculture, control plot or not, when we want to demonstrate what we want to demonstrate, we always get there.
We are at a time when we can no longer believe anyone, especially when there are big pennies behind.
Sad world.
I would believe my own experiments.