Janic wrote:by Moindreffor »02 / 05 / 21, 22: 48Janic wrote:
Hence this absurd speech on the fact that organic (more than organic or industrial organic too) would not feed current society based on largely outdated figures dating from its beginnings, where quantity was no longer the important criterion .that's the blind chemist who takes glasses for eyes, or a wooden leg for a natural leg.by the massive use of fertilizers identical to those of synthesis but natural, hence the catching up of yields, when "organic" becomes natural conventional, well yes it can replace, but what has to be changed ?and again, and always the same tune of the little junk chemist who naively believes in the counter advertising of petrochemicalssynthetic fertilizer is replaced by natural fertilizer, the same molecules of potash coming from mines which are running out and are on the other side of the world as oil is exhausted, another similarity
synthetic pesticides are replaced by natural pesticides, therefore always pesticidesin your dreams, not in the fieldso yes the "organic" does as well as the conventional because it uses the same types of products,
Instead of chatting in the void of your ignorance, visit real organic farmers for decades under the nature and progress label, for example, and your chemical myth will take a hell of a beating in the teeth.always in your fantasies of agrochemistry that wants to talk about what it does not know because no plowing comes from AB, but since you don't know anything about it, you fantasize about the lies of agrochemicals, your friends.with two more drifts, either a more important tillage from where a stronger erosion, or then no more use of soil at all
you know very well that it is false, but you are not close to a lie, the agri AB, begins to come to no-till, it first of all to seek to mechanize weeding, which provoked as in conventional agriculture, the same problemsProgress, another illusion,I see a change in it, the future of which will tell us what it is.you see progress, either ...
the change is already there, according to the latest figures, the growth of "organic" has not reached the same figures this year as in previous years, a drop due to a shift in consumption towards non-organic short-circuit
then, just because sometimes, you have to say things you have maybe 7 years of self-taught theologies so without any reference and without any validation, by any diploma whatsoever, so you can study for 7 years a great void, It does not qualify you in any way, so your level is only what you give, therefore chemist but me graduated, with a real university background
you your only qualification in "organic" it is organic grocer ", and you do not even have it any more, between putting salads on the shelf and making them grow there is a mode, besides here, you have no wire dedicated to the vegetable garden so where is your experience and therefore your expertise?
and I did not wait for your advice to visit and discuss with "real organic producers", I have some in my friends and therefore again and again you talk without knowing, if I allow myself to contradict you, it's good that I have the knowledge to do it and your unique argument to say you don't know nothing so don't talk has no value
you ask yourself knowing organic, do you at least make a vegetable garden? have you ever planted a seed yourself, talking is good acting is better
your knowledge is to copy / paste information, because as you often mention it is not you who says it, they are experts, or others, so if you have nothing to say, why, do you speak as much...