Christophe wrote:ps: I NEVER premacholated this pen for the simple reason that I do not use a pen!
Your sucking preferences are up to you !!!
Gregconstruct wrote:A few years ago (at least 10 years, in fact) I heard of a Canadian company that proposed to replace the polystyrene balls that serve as anti-shock in packages with popcorn (without sugar and not intended for human consumption).
Unfortunately, I have never had the opportunity to receive a popcorn anti-shock package and I wonder if this company still exists ...
Gregconstruct wrote:A few years ago (at least 10 years, in fact) I heard of a Canadian company that proposed to replace the polystyrene balls that serve as anti-shock in packages with popcorn (without sugar and not intended for human consumption).
anti ecological popcorn.
Rabbit wrote:Why anti ecological? I find this product rather good, as effective as polystyrene expense, it has the advantage of being bio degradable and easy to remove. Just put it in water and it dissolves there. This product contains only starch
there is no reason why it is not edible
share that the use made of it and that its production
do not plan this use.
As for the farmer who is bitter to know what we are doing
of his production, that he remembers that it is thanks to this diversification
the transformation of the fruit of their labor (for which
he was paid) that he has work and that the prices of the food industry
have not yet collapsed as is the case with all
other raw materials. He will have time to cry
on his fate when the economic / industrial crisis will have
repercussions on agricultural producers.
Flytox wrote:The farmer in question is of the old generation (85 years old?), Of the one who cannot bear that one can put the bread upside down when it is placed on the table ... out of respect for those who do it.
A+
Back to "waste, recycling and reuse of old objects"
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 107 guests