izentrop wrote:Except that there, it is the government which created the company in charge of operating, the public company Yacimientos de Litio Bolivianos (YLB). The country needs currency and work, no baseless criticism.GuyGadebois wrote:izentrop wrote:https://m.20minutes.fr/amp/a/2603327
But of course. "clean" technologies. Suitable for enriching multinationals.
Except that there:
"All the partnership offers, in particular those of the French Bolloré and the Japanese Mitsubishi, were rejected. Only the Chinese asked to build a potassium factory there had the right to set foot in this highly strategic location ..... .... Still, the government had to face the facts: in December 2018, the national firm YLB (Bolivian public lithium company) signed a cooperation agreement with a German company, then last January with a Chinese company. "
Except that there:
“In addition to disillusionment there is worry and now anger. Producing lithium requires drawing immense quantities of water. The region is arid: not a drop of rain from March to December. extraction threatens to worsen the scarcity of fresh water from which the villagers suffer. Two rivers flow into the desert, and the bed of the Rio Guapay is practically dry. Recent droughts have already cost a year of harvesting quinoa. In Chile, extraction was found to require 200 liters of water per second, not 100 liters as officials claimed. The Indian community of Atacama mobilized and ended up getting low compensation. In Argentina there are also conflicts between local populations and businesses over the use of water. "
https://www.parismatch.com/Actu/Environ ... ie-1629146