13/02/23, 22:57
simpleton
You have the right to think that we must continue to extract oil excessively until the last exploitable drop is extracted. Either way, you'll be dead before.
where did you read that I thought we had to keep mining oil until the last drop of oil was squeezed out? hence your simplistic simpleton nickname! A one-eyed person cannot replace another one-eyed person.
I have the right to think that it is necessary to develop alternative solutions, in particular in the field of transport which is all the same the main consumer of oil, to reserve it for areas where it is almost essential or difficult to replace.
no one disputes this right, but if the future shows us that the one-eyed man has been replaced by a blind man, it will be a mess much worse than before!
There is no doubt that this involves new "negative externalities" that must be managed as well as possible. So what?
then we will be in even more shit, to the mouth!
Humanity lives only positive actions for the environment? For at least three centuries?
it is not humanity as a whole, fortunately, but a few imposing on the masses their visions of a self-destructive world, by technology (new god of our time and his religion) and by mental domination [ *]!
[*] For example Jenner and Pasteur, I return there by obligation; who sincerely believed (I hope) to put an end to deadly epidemics. The intention is commendable in itself, but they had no historical perspective to measure its effects and consequences, which is no longer the case today. The same goes for the consequences of the use of fossil products, but our society has been engulfed in the hope of a better technological world and now we tremble in front of CO2 as tomorrow we will tremble in front of all-electricity, which we already know is It's an industrial aberration, but it's gone from industrial experience to politics with its ignoramuses who know nothing about it and who are advised by other ignoramuses who are no better informed, but who have another juicy business in view!
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré