Scientific reliability and levels of scientific evidence

General scientific debates. Presentations of new technologies (not directly related to renewable energies or biofuels or other themes developed in other sub-sectors) forums).
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 19224
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: bourgogne
x 3491

Re: Scientific reliability and levels of scientific evidence




by Janic » 12/02/21, 08:36

Medicine is indeed a science and therefore knowledge, but here I have no experience to say whether the publications are mostly false.
Very approximate "science" otherwise there would not be so many deaths from disease. In addition OUR western medicine is "scientific", ie coming out of petrochemical laboratories, only recently, compared to the non-science of previous millennia and which did not work. no worse. [*] Now medicine called to become that of the future, when big pharma no longer has control over the disease and can no longer obstruct it, it is homeopathy respecting the maxim of Hippocrates: "'First do no harm". after that of Hippocrates always:"may your food be your medicine "

[*] proof of this is the current great mess with a simple influenza virus, but which makes billions waltz!
0 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79112
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 10972

Re: Scientific reliability and levels of scientific evidence




by Christophe » 12/02/21, 19:41

BaudouinLabrique wrote:Another dismaying observation which already confirmed it:

Prof. Robert Rosenthal has shown that experimenters in psychology, education, medicine and material sciences can unconsciously affect the results of any study, in the sense of what they expected, by contamination of hypotheses issued.
(Jo Godefroid, Psychology, human and cognitive science, Ed. De Boeck University, Brussels, 2008, p. 105).


For those who still doubt human subjectivity on the conclusions of scientific studies, here is the fastest study in the world that proves it. It is titled "The mouse and the breasts" and does not need randomized cohorts, double blinds or anything complicated for its conclusions to be reliable!

: Mrgreen: : Mrgreen: : Mrgreen:

souris.jpg
mouse.jpg (40.46 KIO) Accessed 2064 times


Huh Macro that I'm right? : Mrgreen:
0 x
User avatar
Macro
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6458
Registration: 04/12/08, 14:34
x 1610

Re: Scientific reliability and levels of scientific evidence




by Macro » 12/02/21, 20:00

Which donuts : Mrgreen:
2 x
The only thing safe in the future. It is that there may chance that it conforms to our expectations ...
User avatar
peter
Éconologue good!
Éconologue good!
posts: 363
Registration: 25/10/23, 13:51
x 20

Re: Scientific reliability and levels of scientific evidence




by peter » 30/10/23, 08:28

“Hello Doctor, I have a severe migraine”

- “I don’t believe you, where is the evidence?”

The patient takes his chair and smashes it on the Doctor's skull, saying "And your head hurts?"

“Yes, it hurts a lot but you're crazy...I'm going to call the police”

“Where is the evidence that you are in pain Doctor?”...

: Mrgreen:

100% of blood tests are done AT REST and FASTING, then analyzed in the Lab.
The results are only of value for people who DO NOT EAT and are INACTIVE
and depending on the analysis conditions in the Lab...among other things UNDER the Microscope and IN the test tubes.

...and therefore has NO Scientific value outside of these conditions.
So WITHOUT value for ACTIVE people who MUST eat to be ACTIVE.

A laboratory assistant once told me that it is the management which DECIDES whether something should be found or not...
1 x
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 19224
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: bourgogne
x 3491

Re: Scientific reliability and levels of scientific evidence




by Janic » 30/10/23, 08:56

elementary my dear Wats... Peterrrr! The same AIDS sample sent to 10 labs gave 10 different results and almost all in vitro and non in vivo lab measurements are no better: but, unfortunately, it is these unreliable and unviable means that are taken into account. consideration.
These humans are crazy! : Arrowd: : Arrowd: : Arrowd:
0 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
User avatar
peter
Éconologue good!
Éconologue good!
posts: 363
Registration: 25/10/23, 13:51
x 20

Re: Scientific reliability and levels of scientific evidence




by peter » 30/10/23, 09:40

So, "according to a study"... the labs are not reliable.

Ah yes, it’s true, we only find what we WANT to find.
0 x
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 19224
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: bourgogne
x 3491

Re: Scientific reliability and levels of scientific evidence




by Janic » 30/10/23, 10:55

So, "according to a study"... the labs are not reliable.
Ah yes, it’s true, we only find what we WANT to find.
this is largely true. This is why it is rare, if not impossible, for scientists, all specialties combined, to agree among themselves because there will always be one specialty which contradicts another specialty, especially since the explosion of the era industry and its technologies.
0 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
Ahmed
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 12298
Registration: 25/02/08, 18:54
Location: Burgundy
x 2963

Re: Scientific reliability and levels of scientific evidence




by Ahmed » 30/10/23, 11:28

This is why it would be essential that you state the criteria that you use to discern the specialists who would be "true"...
1 x
"Please don't believe what I'm telling you."
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 19224
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: bourgogne
x 3491

Re: Scientific reliability and levels of scientific evidence




by Janic » 30/10/23, 15:02

30/10/23, 11:28
ahmed
This is why it would be essential that you state the criteria that you use to discern the specialists who would be "true"...
question more philosophical than scientific: what is true and in relation to what and even to whom?
0 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
User avatar
plasmanu
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 2847
Registration: 21/11/04, 06:05
Location: The 07170 Lavilledieu viaduct
x 180

Re: Scientific reliability and levels of scientific evidence




by plasmanu » 30/10/23, 15:06

Not at all Janic.
This is a simple, basic question that anyone could answer. It's yes or it's no... (Maybe it's you)
0 x
"Not to see Evil, not to hear Evil, not to speak Evil" 3 little monkeys Mizaru

Back to "Science and Technology"

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : Macro and 143 guests