Scientific negationism: dogmatism?

[Obamot]

Tsssss ... Obesity is a visible disorder, there are all invisible disorders.

F2739A91-002B-462A-AC04-9D3A759130ED.jpeg

What responsible parent would let their kid binge on?

Responsible parents rely on the new WHO Codex Alimentarius, which presents them with food available in restaurants, supermarkets, as healthy and sanitary safe! Therein lies part of the trap.
In general, parents are obese themselves, and when you are obese you feel guilty. Then you get depressed, then you eat to compensate, you become sedentary to escape view, then get fat even more, it's a vicious circle ...
And there you make guilty remarks against them, which is an aggravating circumstance! Do you sincerely believe that they need lesson-givers? Or rather a context that would restore their self-confidence?

How is it that you who present yourself as the embodied virtue of common sense, you do not uncover these elementary things?

[Janic]

Some will die because they have not been vaccinated,

or precisely because they were vaccinated do you know the staggering number of vaccines "recommended" in the USA! We are funny next door!
Ah, the ariori, the presuppositions! this is the ultra conformism to the liberticidal diktats that you condemn elsewhere!

[Exnihiloest]

...
Responsible parents rely on the new WHO Codex Alimentarius, which presents them with food available in restaurants, supermarkets, as healthy and sanitary safe! Therein lies part of the trap.
In general, parents are obese themselves, and when you are obese you feel guilty. Then you get depressed, then you eat to compensate, you become sedentary to escape view, then get fat even more, it's a vicious circle ...
And there you make guilty remarks against them, which is an aggravating circumstance! Do you sincerely believe that they need lesson-givers? Or rather a context that would restore their self-confidence?

It seems obvious that they need lessons, since there is obviously a problem that they cannot solve. I'm sure you haven't thought of that, and I suspect why, when you have science infused on all subjects, you don't actually need lessons.
It would be good if they made these parents feel guilty, maybe it will make them stir before it's too late. Most people are victims of themselves, few are in dire need of help.
Freedom, apparently, its use is not within the reach of just anyone when it comes to using it to improve their lot and that of their children. You have to take it upon yourself.
Unlike you, I call for responsibility and not for victimization, which is to deny people their emancipated status.

How is it that you who present yourself as the embodied virtue of common sense, you do not uncover these elementary things?

argumentum ad personam => trash can

[Obamot]

And what would make you think I wouldn't call the parents responsible?

What I am saying are things known to the world of prevention. These are thousands of observations and not a personal opinion. You think you're smart but don't bring any tangible element. Zero.

And it would be with your counter pedagogy based on a fallacy that you would “make them responsible”?

Assuming you succeed, their kids will send you serious ...!

[Janic]

take a look at the documentary "our body, this social network" very well done, on france tv which discusses the role of fat in this body

[Obamot]

Fat metabolism is one of the most complicated stuff in human biochemistry. This includes the question of viruses since their envelope is made up of lipids: this is the key.

As long as the trolls understand something about it, we're still going to laugh

[Exnihiloest]

And what would make you think I wouldn't call the parents responsible?
...

The fact that you victimize them.

[Janic]

The fact that you victimize them.

yes, they are biological or cultural victims, especially both, parents and children.

[Obamot]

There is a difference between victimizing and being aware of the problem.

After that, it is on a case-by-case basis, with his practitioner or his shrink.