For those who do not understand what I mean:
It has been + or - 10 years that "we" have been working on water doping derived from the "pantone system" in all "transparency" with regard to the dissemination of research and largely on the internet, and here is that researchers, all that there are officials, are releasing the "Panton principles" to distribute freely and "open sourcing" or rather "Open Knowledge Data Definition" scientific advances!
Crazy, crazy, crazy!
Read, for example:
https://www.econologie.com/synthese-des- ... -3588.html
https://www.econologie.com/forums/principe-d ... t2861.html
Principles for open data in science
Wednesday March 3 2010
The Panton Principles were published in February 2010 by a group of four researchers. They set out the bases on which scientific data must be based so that they are qualified as open. Adherence to these principles can be done individually or institutionally.
The Principles have been translated into French by the Translation Service of INIST-CNRS.
Science is based on the development, reuse and open criticism of published content of scientific knowledge.
In order for science to function properly and for society to take full advantage of scientific activities, it is essential that the data of science is open.
By open data, we mean those that are freely accessible on the public internet, thus allowing all users to download, copy, analyze, reprocess, pass them through software or use them for any other purpose without others. financial, legal or technical barriers than those inseparable from the opening of their direct internet access. For this purpose, data relating to published scientific results must be clearly placed in the public domain.
We solemnly recommend that the following principles be adopted and put into practice:
1. In the event that data or collections of data are published, it is essential that they be published with a declaration clearly and explicitly expressing the will and wish of those who publish them concerning the re-use and recycling of each of the elements, or of the entire collection, of this data or of subsets of this collection. This declaration should be precise, irrevocable, and be based on a valid legal declaration recognized as a waiver or license.
When you publish data, make a statement explicitly and unquestionably stating your will.
2. Many of the widely recognized licenses do not cover or apply to the data. We describe a number of waivers and licenses here. Creative Commons licenses (except CCZéro licenses), GFDL, GPL, BSD, etc. are NOT suitable for data, and their use is STRONGLY discouraged.
Use a waiver or license that is appropriate for the data.
3. The use of licenses which limit commercial re-use or which limit the making of derivative works by excluding use for particular purposes or by particular persons or organizations is STRONGLY discouraged. These licenses effectively make integration and readjustment of data sets impossible and prohibit commercial activities that could be used to enable data retention.
If you want your data to be genuinely used and enriched by third parties, it must be open as defined in the Definition of knowledge or open data (Open Knowledge / Data Definition), in particular by prohibiting the use of non-commercial and other restrictive covenants.
4. In addition, in the scientific field, it is STRONGLY recommended that the data, in particular when it is financed by public funds, be clearly placed in the public domain by means of a declaration and a license consecrating their entry into the public domain (Public Domain Dedication and License-PPDL), or a Creative Commons Zero waiver (CCZero). This practice proceeds from the logic of public funding which supports a large part of scientific research and the general ethics of sharing and reuse in force in the scientific community.
It is strongly recommended to declare in the public domain the data on which the scientific results published are based on PDDL or CCZéro declarations to ensure compliance with both the Protocol for the implementation of open access data (Protocol for Implementing Open Access Data) and the Definition of knowledge or open data (Open Knowledge / Data Definition).
Written declaration by:
Peter Murray-Rust, University of Cambridge (UK)
Cameron Neylon, STFC (UK)
Rufus Pollock, Open Knowledge Foundation and University of Cambridge (UK)
John Wilbanks, Science Commons (USA)
With the assistance of members of the Working Group on Open Data in Science of the Open Knowledge Foundation.
Source: http://openaccess.inist.fr/spip.php?pag ... rticle=283
Original text: http://pantonprinciples.org/
Definition of "Open Data": http://www.opendefinition.org/
