Question of thermodynamics

[Obamot]

Ooooooh yes, we have to change this title, like:

«When you lie as you breathe is it thermodynamics?»

ou

«When you have a stretched nose is this thermodynamics?»

... and to classify in "Humor, hangover" etc ...

[moinsdewatt]

Ooooooh yes, we have to change this title, like:

«When you lie as you breathe is it thermodynamics?»

ou

«When you have a stretched nose is this thermodynamics?»

... and to classify in "Humor, hangover" etc ...

Yes, good idea, but since moderation does not matter, it is not likely to happen.

[Obamot]

Ok, since everyone seemed to agree (except "one"), it was done ...

Apparently ... Everything should be calm now.

Otherwise will you have to call the Bucheron?

[sen-no-sen]

Better to hear from you about who brings you together, rather than pissing you off on the issues that divide you guys!

[dedeleco]

The negationism of reality by teatime = monotherm, is intended to trap investors, for an impossible realization project, negator of the thermodynamic reality of Carnot, constantly checked by our air conditioners.

[sen-no-sen]

The negationism of reality by teatime = monotherm, is intended to trap investors, for an impossible realization project, negator of the thermodynamic reality of Carnot, constantly checked by our air conditioners.

Don't worry, dedicated!
Investors don't already invest in what works, so what doesn't work!

[dedeleco]

Far from being true:

Investors don't already invest in what works, so what doesn't work!

because to see certain projects, investors invest, either like sheep, all the same, with final disasters (like real estate in Spain), or in the sensational, following beautiful talkers of dreams, sometimes, more than in what, new, stands and walks.

Concrete example :
nobody, strictly nobody, in France invests in perpetual geothermal off-season solar, summer sun heating winter no longer consuming anything, without the slightest pollutio, without CO2, or nuclear, in perpetuity, which works since 2007 in www.dlsc.ca (discussed on econology and criticized, even refused, even on econology by many !!)
and many are investing in nuclear heat pumps from behind, or even in poorly designed Canadian wells (well designed this is the one to www.dlsc.ca ), as many do on econology, scorning the solution www.dlsc.ca which has been working since 2007, and possible on a reduced scale, especially in France, much less Cold than at 1000m altitude !!

Investors, rare, prefer much more expensive solutions with huge water tanks, and other complications, often insufficient, as in Christophe's house with a 70m3 buffer, which helps, but is insufficient.

[sen-no-sen]

I wrote:

Investors don't already invest in what works, so what doesn't work!

You write:

Far from true

You contradict yourself:

nobody, strictly nobody, in France invests in perpetual geothermal off-season solar

Sacred dedicate, you are not to a paradox!

[dedeleco]

No, on the contrary, many invest in what does not work, like real estate in Spain, like sheep from Panurge, (with the current recessive disaster in Spain, or the current financial crisis, miserable investments, cause of all the financial crashes), and many others that do not work not (free energy, undersized Canadian well, or wacky handsome speaker idea) and don't invest in what works, www.dlsc.ca , because rare, not credible, for sheep investors from Panurge !!!

monotherm will find a pigeon !!

[Obamot]

Better to hear from you about who brings you together, rather than pissing you off on the issues that divide you guys!

+ 1000