janic aligns false absurdities with his instinctive beliefs:
Pasteurian theory on vaccination has proved and still proves to be a monstrous hoax
is archifal, first because vaccination was invented experimentally for smallpox well before Pasteur, because it was effective before Pasteur, to reduce the consequences of this fatal disease!
Vaccination, which is not a theory, but a reality observed on patients before Pasteur, has made it possible to suppress smallpox on earth, to the point that one no longer vaccinates.Vaccination is based on the observation that for certain diseases, one does not become sick again after having had it, (because our immune system has found and retains the means to defend itself) and thus with an attenuated form one learns to defend oneself.
So she even works without a vaccine, which allowed some of our ancestors to survive in the worst epidemics, because they were fortunate enough to receive by chance an attenuated form of the disease (virus or microbes of the hours or day in the air ), which vaccinated them spontaneously.
janic affirms according to his sentimental impulses, taking as truths distorted affirmations or fuzzy certainties.
For Pasteur, in 1861 (precise date that Janic forgets, because Janic is still in the dark, imprecise)
I did not say that he knew Semmelweis personally, but that his method was known in Europe and America and it is unlikely (not impossible) that he ignored it.
janic in this blur, didn't realize that
Pastor in 1861 had not yet studied human diseases, but was still fermenting and scientifically refuting (with great care) the fashionable theory of spontaneous generation, (dear to janic in the form of creationism),
theory much older than homeopathy (thousands of years) et
justified by the absence of a microscope, which gave an impression of generation from nothing !!
The microscope dear to Pasteur, made it possible to see and understand.
Medicine at the time refused, clinging to a very old theory, much more than homeopathy, simplistic, almost obvious !!
So the seniority and the use by a very large number of doctors of old methods, like homeopathy (and spontaneous generation, it criminal, by the lack of hygiene) does not prove their validity !!!
So homeopathy without a molecule, or scientific justification, is not better than the placebo effect, proof that belief in our brain, helps to heal, but is not enough for serious cases.
Acupuncture has a much better scientific proof, especially about pain.
Finally, this need for a placebo drug by patients, even for small problems that do not need medication, explains the prescription of drugs in excess (as useless, absurd and dangerous painkillers, given automatically by doctors, that I refused a lot of times, with my wife, a dangerous absurdity for pregnant woman) explains their prescription of placebo homeopathy instead !!!
Moreover, it is scientifically proven, that the placebo works, even if the patient knows that the pilulle is bogus containing nothing!
This is the case with homeopathy, since the patient has heard that there is nothing after the dilutions!
But the bases of homeopathy are without any scientific basis, close to a belief without solid proof in general principles, is as aberrant as the spontaneous generation before 1861, medical doctrine of the time more than a thousand years old, taught , which does not prove its validity.
It owes its persistence only to the absence of molecule, therefore without danger, (absurd to believe in a medical effect) and to the placebo effect, thanks to our brain which controls our immune system by full of hormones.
Finally science is a long process of precise experiments, of analysis, of tests, of cross-checking, of numerous precise facts, of critics analyzed, of care to avoid doctrines and dogmatic certainties, and therefore not at all the method of janic , quite dogmatic, of certain belief, based on peremptory, general, vague, imprecise statements.
