What I wanted to express is that in a lot of science documentaries that fall within the scope of the theory of evolution, often the commentator cannot help but use the mount "creature" which is incongruous in this case and , tends to discredit a theory which is proven in multiple ways while the theories of the universalist religions of Salvation (Judaism, Christianity, Zoroastrianism, Buddhism or even Islam) are completely invalidated due to ever more precise scientific discoveries .Janic wrote:The evidence is only accumulating in this direction. So people who still believe in religions voluntarily put on blinkers.
Do not confuse evidence with indications. To date, no scientist has been able to prove the spontaneous generation which would have resulted from a self-organization that Sen no sen likes to evoke. “Now if the facts are like stones… .etc” We are not at the facts, but at hypotheses, assumptions, theories, the famous SI.
Do not put the cart before the horse.
It's widely proven, so we have to let go of old beliefs and change the paradigm. The man did not come from Jupiter's thigh nor from I do not know which "god";)