eclectron wrote:But you don't see your denial and your inconsistency (and you gon 'tell me what * denial, what * inconsistency)
exactly, and coming from a guy who filled pages and pages to deny that a system violated the second principle when it had been demonstrated to him in three lines, the judgment does not lack salt!
don't you see that you are not honest with reality or worse deliberately deceptive like a lobbyist
I will see it when you have shown it instead of asserting it without proof, (which is called defamation), that is to say simply get out of the assertions that I would have made without being founded on known principles or facts. What I do to tell you that you are incoherent (as I do for Obamot, Guy or Janic).
Excuse me for making sense of the words, if I say someone is not being honest with reality, I prove it by comparing what they said to reality, not otherwise.
So: give me a verbatim quote where I wasn't "truthful", and tell everyone why. But pay attention to the dates, when Guitounet wanted to "demonstrate" that I had said fanciful figures on the epidemic, he just wallowed miserably ...