Haguenauer electromagnetic motor: the wrong to be right

General scientific debates. Presentations of new technologies (not directly related to renewable energies or biofuels or other themes developed in other sub-sectors) forums).
User avatar
Exnihiloest
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5365
Registration: 21/04/15, 17:57
x 660

Re: Haguenauer electromagnetic motor: Wrong to be right




by Exnihiloest » 08/03/21, 21:39

eclectron wrote:For amateurs, there is a little Raoul Hatem side in Haguenauer's device
Said like Raoul, we are sure it does not work.


Raoul has reinvented the magnetic gear, which the industry has been producing for a long time.
But magnetic gear or not, it is not by turning 10 alternators given for 1KW with a single motor given for 1KW, that we can obtain 10 KW with 1 KW. It's so childishly naive that it pities me, Raoul. Still believe in these childishness. At his age ! And without even daring to check (it was enough to try to complete the trick to understand why it does not work)! This is the "sweet dreamer" I was talking about.

He didn't have to find investors either. Another brilliant inventor ignored by mainstream science ... : Lol:
0 x
Cost
I discovered econologic
I discovered econologic
posts: 4
Registration: 01/04/21, 19:29

Re: electromagnetic motor: Wrong to be right




by Cost » 01/04/21, 19:38

ABC2019 wrote:
Grelinette wrote:a motor which can "be self-powered", therefore an "over-unit" machine?

given the style of the message "misunderstood genius", I think that's it : roll:

the funny thing is that the explanations of how these machines work are still based on the known laws of physics, Archimedes' thrust, Maxwell's electromagnetism, etc. which are known to involve in general the conservation of energy, it has been demonstrated for at least 150 years in a Universal. But nevertheless we are offered machines that without introducing any new law , would violate this conservation of energy!
if again we were told that we had discovered a fifth force, or how to use the cosmological constant, again, why not. But with magnets and or floats frankly ... no way !!!



The problem for engineers, which lead them to refuse this possibility, comes from the fact that they confuse ENERGIES and STRENGTHS.
If they are right in terms of energy, a force such as magnetism does not wear out and continues to push without being consumed ... until it dies out after + - 80 years. They might be able to understand that, but to sit back on their pride and accept that they didn't think about it ... it's more difficult.
0 x
ABC2019
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 12927
Registration: 29/12/19, 11:58
x 1008

Re: electromagnetic motor: Wrong to be right




by ABC2019 » 01/04/21, 19:42

Koste wrote:The problem for engineers, which lead them to refuse this possibility, comes from the fact that they confuse ENERGIES and STRENGTHS.

then they are completely null engineers, like those who confuse energy and power (kW and kWh for example).

If they are right in terms of energy, a force such as magnetism does not wear out and continues to push without being consumed ... until it dies out after + - 80 years. They might be able to understand that, but to sit back on their pride and accept that they didn't think about it ... it's more difficult.

there is also a magnetic energy, and it is part of the conservation of the total energy, like the other energies.
But hey if you want to reinvent physics on your own, good luck.

Will you send us the copy of your termination letter to your electricity supplier when you have figured out how to charge an inverter without spending anything?
0 x
To pass for an idiot in the eyes of a fool is a gourmet pleasure. (Georges COURTELINE)

Mééé denies nui went to parties with 200 people and was not even sick moiiiiiii (Guignol des bois)
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538

Re: electromagnetic motor: Wrong to be right




by Obamot » 01/04/21, 20:33

Koste wrote:The problem for engineers, which lead them to refuse this possibility, comes from the fact that they confuse ENERGIES and STRENGTHS.
If they're right about energy, a force such as magnetism does not wear out and continues to grow without being consumed ... until it is extinguished after + - 80 years.They might be able to understand that, but to sit back on their pride and accept that they didn't think about it ... it's more difficult.
It's not a stupid idea, you have to patent it, you have to ask ABC2019 for a helping hand, it is a specialist : Cheesy:
0 x
User avatar
Exnihiloest
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5365
Registration: 21/04/15, 17:57
x 660

Re: electromagnetic motor: Wrong to be right




by Exnihiloest » 01/04/21, 21:02

Koste wrote:... The problem of engineers, and which lead them to refuse this possibility, comes from the fact that they confuse ENERGIES and STRENGTHS.
If they are right about energy, a force such as magnetism does not wear out and continues to push without being consumed ...

Climatologists, maybe, but engineers don't make this ridiculous confusion. Everyone understands this.

And there is much simpler than magnetism, and a much more powerful force: the one with the butt in his chair will exert a force of, say, 80 Kg. And the force never wears out as long as the guy stay in his chair! "without consuming"! Miracle!

As long as we have not understood that work, therefore energy, is the product Force x Displacement, and that a force is therefore of no interest when it is not made to work, we would be well inspired to '' learn the basics of physics before talking about it, and even more, before claiming that engineers would confuse a high school student, or even a college student.
0 x
User avatar
GuyGadeboisTheBack
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 14824
Registration: 10/12/20, 20:52
Location: 04
x 4302

Re: Haguenauer electromagnetic motor: Wrong to be right




by GuyGadeboisTheBack » 01/04/21, 23:27

Image
1 x
izentrop
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 13644
Registration: 17/03/14, 23:42
Location: picardie
x 1502
Contact :

Re: Haguenauer electromagnetic motor: Wrong to be right




by izentrop » 01/04/21, 23:31

Didn't he get you?Image
0 x
User avatar
GuyGadeboisTheBack
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 14824
Registration: 10/12/20, 20:52
Location: 04
x 4302

Re: Haguenauer electromagnetic motor: Wrong to be right




by GuyGadeboisTheBack » 01/04/21, 23:45

izentrop wrote:Didn't he get you?

He especially took the opportunity to tackle the climatologists once again. The rest..... : roll:
And worse, who is "you"? I did not participate in this thread.
0 x
User avatar
Exnihiloest
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5365
Registration: 21/04/15, 17:57
x 660

Re: Haguenauer electromagnetic motor: Wrong to be right




by Exnihiloest » 02/04/21, 19:04

GuyGadeboisLeRetour wrote:He especially took the opportunity to tackle the climatologists once again.

Incompetent people who constantly plant themselves in their forecasts and continue to speak out.
I will never succeed in "tackling" them to the extent of their nuisance.

Did you mean "berate" I guess?
It reveals the footballer! Ah these sportsmen, nothing in the brain, they can make buddy / buddy with the climatologists.
0 x
User avatar
GuyGadeboisTheBack
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 14824
Registration: 10/12/20, 20:52
Location: 04
x 4302

Re: Haguenauer electromagnetic motor: Wrong to be right




by GuyGadeboisTheBack » 02/04/21, 20:10

Exnihiloest wrote:It reveals the footballer! Ah these sportsmen, nothing in the brain, they can make buddy / buddy with the climatologists.

health-pollution-prevention / glyphosate-an-ecological-effective-non-cancer-causing-non-endocrine-disrupting-herbicide-t16264-220.html? hilit = foot # p382219
In addition, it is also a rugby term. Ignore.
0 x

 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Back to "Science and Technology"

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : A.D. 44, Remundo and 190 guests