Haguenauer wrote:I just answered that to electron.Thank you for looking at the answer I just gave him
In principle, I don't usually post a personal message. (unlike others ... )
If you want, you can post your answer later.
Haguenauer wrote:I just answered that to electron.Thank you for looking at the answer I just gave him
eclectron wrote:Haguenauer wrote:I just answered that to electron.Thank you for looking at the answer I just gave him
In principle, I don't usually post a personal message. (unlike others ... )
If you want, you can post your answer later.
Haguenauer wrote:t I really feel like I'm wasting my time talking about things when I have a lot of other things to do. THANK YOU.
Haguenauer wrote:Could you be so kind as to do it for me. ... THANK YOU.
Hello,
Thanks for the appreciation. As I said earlier. So far I have been able to demonstrate that the driving principle works. What was not obvious, even if ultimately the operating principles are simple. The energy balance is not yet optimized and I am looking for money to produce a demonstration model that can be verified by all the scientific authorities who wish. There is such a willingness to nip progress in the bud on the part of many people that it bothers that the result should only be released when it is more than satisfactory. Which of course I don't doubt for a moment, but ...
Unfortunately, the circumstances mean that I have to look for money to finish. which makes me waste time, and forces me to realize that once again Einstein was right they things are endless: the Universe and human stupidity. But, as far as the Universe is concerned, I have not yet acquired absolute certainty. "
ABC2019 wrote: And the only people who have an interest in making believe in the wind, they are the crooks and the manipulators.
ABC2019 wrote:ABC2019 wrote: And the only people who have an interest in making believe in the wind, they are the crooks and the manipulators.
eclectron wrote:ABC2019 wrote:ABC2019 wrote: And the only people who have an interest in making believe in the wind, they are the crooks and the manipulators.
We can also be mistaken in good faith and firmly believe in it, until proven guilty.
ABC2019 wrote:eclectron wrote:ABC2019 wrote:because I am not reasoning on "beliefs", but on established and proven facts. .
Is one ...
it is a belief to say that the established facts are true ?
Yet when you think that graphene could produce a direct current, by saying that it could be "true", do you think that it could be "an established fact" it seems to me?
eclectron wrote:Haguenauer wrote:Could you be so kind as to do it for me. ... THANK YOU.
No worriesHello,
Thanks for the appreciation. As I said earlier. For the moment I was able to demonstrate that the motor principle works. What was not obvious, even if ultimately the operating principles are simple. The energy balance is not yet optimized and I am looking for money to produce a demonstration model that can be verified by all the scientific authorities who wish. There is such a willingness to nip progress in the bud on the part of many people that it bothers that the result should only be released when it is more than satisfactory. Which of course I don't doubt for a moment, but ...
Unfortunately, the circumstances mean that I have to look for money to finish. which makes me waste time, and forces me to realize that once again Einstein was right they things are endless: the Universe and human stupidity. But, as far as the Universe is concerned, I have not yet acquired absolute certainty. "
Obamot wrote:ABC2019 wrote:eclectron wrote:Is one ...
it is a belief to say that the established facts are true ?
Yet when you think that graphene could produce a direct current, by saying that it could be "true", do you think that it could be "an established fact" it seems to me?
This assertion seems wrong to me. It seems to me that it was you who hastily introduced this idea that we were thinking that. Or can you show us a single post where someone said that?
If so, I would have reacted sharply,eclectron wrote:Haguenauer wrote:Could you be so kind as to do it for me. ... THANK YOU.
No worriesHello,
Thanks for the appreciation. As I said earlier. For the moment I was able to demonstrate that the motor principle works. What was not obvious, even if ultimately the operating principles are simple. The energy balance is not yet optimized and I am looking for money to produce a demonstration model that can be verified by all the scientific authorities who wish. There is such a willingness to nip progress in the bud on the part of many people that it bothers that the result should only be released when it is more than satisfactory. Which of course I don't doubt for a moment, but ...
Unfortunately, the circumstances mean that I have to look for money to finish. which makes me waste time, and forces me to realize that once again Einstein was right they things are endless: the Universe and human stupidity. But, as far as the Universe is concerned, I have not yet acquired absolute certainty. "
Demonstrate what? I haven't figured out yet, if I wanted to invest, I would first like to understand.
It depends on what is the objective to be achieved, if as ABC2019 said - the goal is to breathe a tad of electricity into an electromagnetic motor, based on the principle of making it run with a minimum of loss, without for you might as well claim an exponential gain once the device is on - there, there is nothing else to show that this machine will not be able to promise more than it can produce ... In this case, you have no no need for funds, your work is serious and you are sure of it, you go quite officially to a polytechnic with your project and they will measure you everything you want to know, they are equipped - you can do that as a cooperation project, a partnership (or whatever) it can be included in the school curriculum, who knows? - there are professors who dream of associating their name with new discoveries (some don't even look for that), invite some into your lab, they'll tell you what they think and it might even give you some ideas, and above all stay “cool”.
I know this because there are precedents like with Solar Impulse: big partnership https://actu.epfl.ch/news/solar-impulse ... epfl-on-2/
If, on the other hand, the objective is not clear, I fear that it should be expressed better.
Back to "Science and Technology"
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 187 guests