Critical look at zetetics

[Adrien (ex-nico239)]

Ah they are the whistleblowers of the mediator

In this case I take my hat off to them

If it is the art of doubt as I read on the net ... why not?
But it's rather conspiratorial as an idea, right?

[GuyGadebois]

Ah they are the whistleblowers of the mediator

In this case I take my hat off to them

If it is the art of doubt as I read on the net ... why not?
But it's rather conspiratorial as an idea, right?

The scandal of the pick was revealed by Irène Frachon, a pulmonologist at the CHU de Brest. The Nazi clowns only revealed the failings of clairvoyants, magicians and other zozos.

[Adrien (ex-nico239)]

Ah they are the whistleblowers of the mediator

In this case I take my hat off to them

If it is the art of doubt as I read on the net ... why not?
But it's rather conspiratorial as an idea, right?

The scandal of the pick was revealed by Irène Frachon, a pulmonologist at the CHU de Brest. The Nazi clowns only revealed the failings of clairvoyants, magicians and other zozos.

yes I know

I did not know.

In the genre I prefer Kant or Pascal.

[Christophe]

The link between the trolls and the zeteticians is established. These have become, visibly, a sect in the pay of the lobbies according to this world journalist:

The rest of the video is also interesting ...

[Janic]

excellent! not especially concerning zetetics, but precisely on this confusion between true and false sciences, zetetics taking advantage of this confusion to recommend itself to be itself denouncer of false sciences other than themselves.
The zeteticians on this site regularly demonstrate this with one-sided skepticism.

[ABC2019]

The link between the trolls and the zeteticians is established. These have become, visibly, a sect in the pay of the lobbies according to this world journalist ...

Personally, I also distanced myself from zetetics (while I fully adhered to the "historical" zetetics of Henri Broch who, on the contrary, respected all speeches, but asking to justify them). But your argument "it's a sect because a journalist from the world says so", it's also embarrassing, who tells you that it's not the journalist of the world who is biased?

[Christophe]

I said according to ... Maybe you want me to change my sentence to the conditional?

Bin no, because I consider that they are dirty idiots with psychological methods of inquisition closed minds and imbued with their knowledge ...

In fact, they don't even deserve the name of scientists because to advance science, you need a minimum open-mindedness!

That's what I'm saying: inquisitive methods, the dark age of Science!

They are "knowing" who do not "know" that they do not "know" everything!

[ABC2019]

on the current zeteticians, I would quite agree; but it is all the more unfortunate that the initial spirit of Henri Broch was rather: okay to listen to all the assertions, but we will agree together on how to verify them, and then we will move on verification (bad luck, none of the "heterodox" proposals he received passed the verifications, but at least he had offered honestly to do so).

[Christophe]

Okay with that but they've seriously deviated from obscurantism !!

I read "Become sorcerers, become scholars" written with Georges Charpak when it was released in 2002 ...
I hadn't learned much ... but I remembered Barnum's syndrome ...

[Janic]

ABC2019 »03/12/20, 14:02

on the current zeteticians, I would quite agree; but it is all the more unfortunate that the initial spirit of Henri Broch was rather: okay to listen to all the assertions, but we will agree together on how to verify them, and then we will move on verification (bad luck, none of the "heterodox" proposals he received passed the verifications, but at least he had offered honestly to do so).

if you believe that, it is because zetetics is seriously sticking to you and it would then be time to change your mind, starting by not taking up their usual presuppositions and a priori.