Critical look at zetetics

General scientific debates. Presentations of new technologies (not directly related to renewable energies or biofuels or other themes developed in other sub-sectors) forums).
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 19224
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: bourgogne
x 3491

Re: A critical look at zetetics




by Janic » 14/12/20, 06:44

“It is difficult to find an example of a quack that has spread so far influencing the public health response to a deadly pandemic and creating widespread confusion around the world. "
Not at all! Pasteur made his bougliboulga on 1 only patient, a child, without double-blind randomized trials, etc ... and a whole part of the medical profession followed him with his eyes closed and he is the one who is praised with vaccines. A swindler, since he was not a doctor, the great winner of the credulity and the imbecility of a part of the medical profession which has become dominant today and that is historical.
0 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538

Re: A critical look at zetetics




by Obamot » 14/12/20, 09:10

izentrop wrote:
Obamot wrote:First of all, it is irrelevant, it has nothing to do with zetetics, nothing "scientific" but you have to expect everything from a zetetician.

It's just outrageous provocation to get us to react. From ordinary mediocrity by strangers to notorious incompetence, who think they are experts and “woueb heroes”. Pathetic.

the ineffective version of Ockham's razor, a fundamental principle of zetetics.

You may understand this version, explained here to children:
- what is Ockham's razor

Glad you learned a new Izentrop word, finally a video adapted to your IQ

I was using it before you even signed up on this forum seven years ago Image Company-and-philosophy / we-only-in-the-universe-t12248-100.html # p250742
0 x
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 19224
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: bourgogne
x 3491

Re: A critical look at zetetics




by Janic » 27/04/21, 09:16

https://leblogduradis.com/2019/04/01/ze ... -soi-meme/
A reflection setting the record straight :D
0 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
User avatar
GuyGadeboisTheBack
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 14824
Registration: 10/12/20, 20:52
Location: 04
x 4302

Re: A critical look at zetetics




by GuyGadeboisTheBack » 27/04/21, 13:29

izentrop wrote:The "French scientist" Didier Raoult receives the Rusty Razor Award for pseudoscience

When we see the asshole face of this little shit who from the top of his pretension imagines that what he can say would have any value, we laugh and drink a Perrier puck with Raoult!
Image
1 x
User avatar
Macro
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6459
Registration: 04/12/08, 14:34
x 1610

Re: A critical look at zetetics




by Macro » 27/04/21, 13:36

GuyGadeboisLeRetour wrote: we laugh and we drink a Perrier puck with Raoult!


Don't poison yourself with that Guy ... it's full of CO2 : Cheesy:
2 x
The only thing safe in the future. It is that there may chance that it conforms to our expectations ...
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 19224
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: bourgogne
x 3491

Re: A critical look at zetetics




by Janic » 27/04/21, 15:30

Don't poison yourself with that Guy ... it's full of CO2
it is odious! : Shock:
0 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
User avatar
Macro
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6459
Registration: 04/12/08, 14:34
x 1610

Re: A critical look at zetetics




by Macro » 27/04/21, 15:48

For a few years ... Perrier water has been enriched with CO² from we do not know whether or not gas from the source .... I know that because I drink it every day .... And that I read the label

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perrier_( ... %C3%A9rale)
0 x
The only thing safe in the future. It is that there may chance that it conforms to our expectations ...
User avatar
GuyGadeboisTheBack
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 14824
Registration: 10/12/20, 20:52
Location: 04
x 4302

Re: A critical look at zetetics




by GuyGadeboisTheBack » 27/04/21, 16:13

Macro wrote:In recent years ... Perrier water has been enriched with CO² from we do not know or and not from gas from the source ...

And yes Nestlé has been there ... :(
0 x
izentrop
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 13644
Registration: 17/03/14, 23:42
Location: picardie
x 1502
Contact :

Re: A critical look at zetetics




by izentrop » 15/11/21, 23:06

The most intuitive subjects are also the most believing, the most analytical subjects, the most skeptical.

"It is with the heart that we perceive God and not with reason. This is faith" Pascal
0 x
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 19224
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: bourgogne
x 3491

Re: A critical look at zetetics




by Janic » 16/11/21, 09:13

izMentrop »16/11/21, 00:06
The most intuitive subjects are also the most believing, the most analytical subjects, the most skeptical.
ouarf, ouarf! Fundamentally inaccurate nutty formula.

"It is with the heart that one perceives God [*] and not with reason. This is faith " Pascal
effectively; it is in human nature to perceive many things through feelings: how can such and such an individual know if another loves him (or hates him)? Not by the septic tank analysis! : Cheesy: of reason!
Ah, these shoddy zeteticians who believe themselves to be analytical when they are only opposed to notions and values ​​which are totally foreign to them, since they have not been experienced.

[*] the first thing to do is to start by defining, for each individual, what this word covers, otherwise some speak of cabbages and others of carrots.
Come on izmentrop, so give your own definition!
0 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré

Back to "Science and Technology"

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : A.D. 44, Remundo and 189 guests