Observations since March: another subject that goes awry like the problem of cereals and world hunger.
I see that some people cannot bear the contradiction, the spirits are heating up, it's not good for the planet
Too bad, the subject was interesting; these observations of the sky deserve an explanation.
It would take a real independent and neutral moderator in this forum, because there are more and more subjects that degenerate.
locked Chemtrails: Why?
-
- I posted 500 messages!
- posts: 565
- Registration: 25/03/08, 00:28
- Location: planet Mars
-
- Moderator
- posts: 79112
- Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
- Location: Greenhouse planet
- x 10972
1) It's funny this mania to put 100% of the responsibility on the back of the moderators. As I was the only one on the subject at the end, I feel particularly targeted ... Obviously as always (in France in particular) must find the culprits ...
If you want to know everything, the real person responsible for this closure is momo68 because the public insults sorry I do not tolerate ... It was the drop of water ... as they say.
2) Sorry but you confuse the notion of moderator of a forum and moderator / moderator of a televised debate. I don't have to be a vegetable on my own forum! On the contrary, the paranoid discussions of some other modos on others forums would have censored them long ago ...
3) Here is a private message from Cuicui, who is in the "chemtrails" camp, I remind you:
To which I replied:
4) Finally: the relationship in chemtrails and econology is still distant ...
If you want to know everything, the real person responsible for this closure is momo68 because the public insults sorry I do not tolerate ... It was the drop of water ... as they say.
2) Sorry but you confuse the notion of moderator of a forum and moderator / moderator of a televised debate. I don't have to be a vegetable on my own forum! On the contrary, the paranoid discussions of some other modos on others forums would have censored them long ago ...
3) Here is a private message from Cuicui, who is in the "chemtrails" camp, I remind you:
For chemtrails, I regret momo68's unnecessarily hurtful tone, which hurts the "chemtrailer" camp, while the lockdown proves it right (see these "anti-chemtrailers", as they are intolerant and sectarian ...).
I do not want to inflame the discussion, but I find that this subject had the advantage of encouraging people to look at the sky and to make their hypotheses, even if it means verifying or invalidating them afterwards, without necessarily seeing the evidence of a great plot.
To which I replied:
Well visitors can still, it is not because it is closed that it is no longer readable. I think that EVERYTHING had been said anyway. If there is anything new about discoveries or observations, nothing prevents opening a new subject ...
4) Finally: the relationship in chemtrails and econology is still distant ...
Last edited by Christophe the 06 / 05 / 08, 11: 59, 1 edited once.
0 x
Do a image search or an text search - Netiquette of forum
- nonoLeRobot
- Master Kyot'Home
- posts: 790
- Registration: 19/01/05, 23:55
- Location: Beaune 21 / Paris
- x 13
Hello everyone.
I am neither for nor against Chems. I have observed the opinions, the sources and the sky for some time…
Nothing deserves to be insulted on the forum, like pro or anti.
Any new comments are welcome.
As Chris says, if there's something new, there's nothing stopping you from creating a new topic.
By cons there is still a relationship with ecology:
- Modification of the sky, due to the numerous passages of jets rejecting water vapor.
- Accentuation of this modification, for pro-chems.
So, at a minimum, certainly a modification of local climates.
In addition, I appreciate the testimony of people who remember other different ancient seasons. It's always good to hear, even if there is a bit of melancholy or errors in judgment. It is always more meaningful in impressions and emotions than statistics, considered according to the conclusions we want to reach.
If the sky is veiled, the air of nothing, by 15%, that goes against a development of solar energy.
At the level of the ethics of the rulers, we cannot keep the discourse that we must encourage solar, if at the same time we dry up the useful solar source ...
I agree that 85% of the sun is always better than burning the equivalent in fossil energy.
I am neither for nor against Chems. I have observed the opinions, the sources and the sky for some time…
Nothing deserves to be insulted on the forum, like pro or anti.
Any new comments are welcome.
As Chris says, if there's something new, there's nothing stopping you from creating a new topic.
By cons there is still a relationship with ecology:
- Modification of the sky, due to the numerous passages of jets rejecting water vapor.
- Accentuation of this modification, for pro-chems.
So, at a minimum, certainly a modification of local climates.
In addition, I appreciate the testimony of people who remember other different ancient seasons. It's always good to hear, even if there is a bit of melancholy or errors in judgment. It is always more meaningful in impressions and emotions than statistics, considered according to the conclusions we want to reach.
If the sky is veiled, the air of nothing, by 15%, that goes against a development of solar energy.
At the level of the ethics of the rulers, we cannot keep the discourse that we must encourage solar, if at the same time we dry up the useful solar source ...
I agree that 85% of the sun is always better than burning the equivalent in fossil energy.
0 x
-
- Moderator
- posts: 79112
- Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
- Location: Greenhouse planet
- x 10972
gegyx wrote:Hello everyone.
I am neither for nor against Chems. I have observed the opinions, the sources and the sky for some time…
Uh, it's not to relaunch the "controversy" but it was you who gave the last link on CONspiration.CaCa
ps: I insult anyone ... even if I sometimes use words (some leave me no choice) words that can be hurtful ...
0 x
Do a image search or an text search - Netiquette of forum
gegyx wrote:Nothing deserves to be insulted on the forum, like pro or anti.
Any new comments are welcome.
I can only agree with this very wise remark. I'm holding her back, Gegyx.
From my point of view, Christophe has never been insulting on the subject Chemtrails, he may have been a little virulent in his answers, but without attack people, However in response to more than incisive arrests affecting directly himself.
I will add that it is "his" forum and that he has the right to lock a subject without having to justify himself "particularly", even if that may seem unfair, even for admissible reasons ...
Just like forumers can open new threads and continue viewing the old one forum which is not offline.
This is my feeling, and having participated very little (but having followed it) on the subject Chemtrails, I immediately slip away ...
0 x
-
- Moderator
- posts: 79112
- Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
- Location: Greenhouse planet
- x 10972
Remundo wrote:From my point of view, Christophe has never been insulting on the subject Chemtrails, he may have been a little virulent in his answers, but without attack people, However in response to more than incisive arrests affecting directly himself.
0 x
Do a image search or an text search - Netiquette of forum
- Woodcutter
- Econologue expert
- posts: 4731
- Registration: 07/11/05, 10:45
- Location: Mountain ... (Trièves)
- x 2
-
- Moderator
- posts: 79112
- Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
- Location: Greenhouse planet
- x 10972
Ah glad to read you Woodcutter! Yep you abandoned me loosely ...
You're back (even moderately?) Then?
You're back (even moderately?) Then?
0 x
Do a image search or an text search - Netiquette of forum
Back to "Science and Technology"
Who is online ?
Users browsing this forum : Macro and 217 guests