Yes Janic, and what Macro says is absolutely correct - of course you have to treat yourself when you are sick, just as you have to have the firefighter extinguish the fire in a fire (or the doctor the infection ) “Do nothing” is not what we say and we have never said anything like it, it has nothing to do - and without wanting to answer for you, it is as often the angle attack the wrong problem.Macro wrote:Cépafo…. The best way to treat an illness without the risk of side effects is not to treat it… Or more simply not to contract it so as not to have to treat it….Janic wrote:Obamot »20/07/21, 11:08absolutely! It's like struggling to wipe up the water that overflows from the tub, without turning off the tap. Stupid!This is also why they make rays ... which are also carcinogenic ...
This is what it is to want to persist in not treating the causes of evil ...
Ho damn… .It hurts my head to think so much….
All the “upstream” reasoning is missing to solve the problem ... (what to do to avoid irritation and infections?)
The historical error being to approach the situation by reasoning “downstream” to resolve it, we arrive when the fire has been smoldering for ages, that before the fatal ignition point we had not stashed the matches. in a place where the unconscious could not reach them, and that the only recourse left is to call the firefighters to extinguish the fire ...
And we just say that if we are in a cellar the water from the firefighters can drown us, or their Co2 suffocate us ...
And besides, I even believe that Macro can understand the reasoning, since he is a former pyromaniac firefighter who repented, since he smoked 3 packs a day and that he told us he stopped ... (with congratulations...). Only he must not have read the text highlighted in yellow, where all the above was already contained. ( )
But ouch ouch ouch, I have a sore face, I shouldn't have thought so much ... (etc)