Anti FakeNews: understanding and analyzing information (scientific or other)

[Janic]

they can say true things that no one will dispute, for example if Casasnovas says that eating raw vegetables is good for you, no one will dispute that. It's like a fundamentalist imam says it's wrong to take drugs, no one will argue that either.

your level of bullshit is constantly increasing (scientifically undeniable) Your ignorance of this subject, one more, still does not prevent you from telling anything, and especially anything

[Christophe]

Hey calmos jlenic !!

[Janic]

Christophe "16/03/21, 14:38

Hey calmos jlenic !!

well done, it is excellent!

[Christophe]

Method for not relaying a fake:

verifier info.png (88.3 KiB) Viewed 2030 times

[pedrodelavega]

A very telling example:

The spread of fake news on social networks explained in two images.
70 times more retweets for false information than for its correction.

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

A very telling example:
The spread of fake news on social networks explained in two images.

The spread of fake news on the web illustrated in two links:
https://www.afis.org/
https://seppi.over-blog.com/

[ABC2019]

A very telling example:
The spread of fake news on social networks explained in two images.

The spread of fake news on the web illustrated in two links:
https://www.afis.org/
https://seppi.over-blog.com/

What's the fake news in there?

[Exnihiloest]

Method for not relaying a fake:

This diagram is theoretically excellent, but in practice, has a weak point: it is the question "Did I understand the information correctly?".
A fakenews relayer understands better than everyone else, I doubt that he will ever answer "no" to this question!

[Christophe]

Exact then there is also the: