The fable of anthropogenic warming, the return

Humanitarian catastrophes (including resource wars and conflicts), natural, climate and industrial (except nuclear or oil forum fossil and nuclear energy). Pollution of the sea and oceans.
User avatar
Exnihiloest
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5365
Registration: 21/04/15, 17:57
x 660

Re: The fable of anthropogenic warming, the return




by Exnihiloest » 06/09/21, 23:15

GuyGadeboisLeRetour wrote:You are really "the absolute nut", you ... rising waters = less land ...


Promises, promises, always promises! ... but no global reduction of land.

And these morons atolls who progress without wanting to bow to the climastrologic dictatorship of warmist dogma! These flourishing atolls do not think of future generations, they are no longer scary, how to impress the masses then, if we laugh! : Lol:
0 x
ABC2019
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 12927
Registration: 29/12/19, 11:58
x 1008

Re: The fable of anthropogenic warming, the return




by ABC2019 » 06/09/21, 23:21

Exnihiloest wrote:
GuyGadeboisLeRetour wrote:IMPOSTURE by Blédina (It is written in the article):

... Land reclamation was primarily responsible for increasing the area of ​​atolls.

Disassembled with its own sources in 2 minutes ... You can go to hell!


No one denies it. Funny how morons always want to kick open doors.

It doesn't matter how and whether it is partly natural or man-made. The reality is that the area of ​​atolls is increasing as we were predicted that the islands would be submerged, and that the point of no return had been reached..
We see that this is not the case, that climastrologists still screwed up, that men did not wait for them to manage their coasts and that in this case they did so for reasons other than the warming, and easily. No anti-CO2 measure would have had this effectiveness.


The article gives details: although land reclamation is the main cause of the increase in area, it does not represent more than 100% (which should have been the case if the natural tendency was to decrease. ), but less than 100%: which means that the natural contribution is ALSO positive.


Between the oldest (1999–2001 or 1999–2002) and most recent (2017) composite images, the land area on the 221 atolls examined increased by 61.74 km2 from 1007.60 km2 to 1069.35 km2, a 6.1% increase. Most of this increase, 38.89 km2, occurred between 2013 and 2017 (Fig. 3). The global-scale change in atoll island landmass was largely a product of an increase of island area in the Maldives and South China Sea (SCS), which account for 54.05 km2 (87.56%) of the global increase in land area. Between 1999–2001 and 2017, the Maldives added 37.50 km2 of land area, representing 60.74% of the net global increase in atoll land area (Fig. 3). Tokelau and Tuvalu, both small landmasses (9.65 km2 and 25.14 km2 respectively), both increased by ∼7%, while the Marshalls, French Polynesia, Kiribati, Palau, Chagos and the Federated States of Micronesia all changed by less than 3%. At the national-scale French Polynesia and Palau were the only countries for which a net decrease in land area was observed (-1.46 km2 or -0.48% and -0.16 km2 or -2.71% respectively). All these changes are <8% and therefore are potentially within the uncertainty of measurement. We could find no evidence of widespread, chronic erosion of atoll islands over our study period. These observations are consistent with previous studies that have largely found that atoll islands have had stable or increasing land areas over the second half of the 20th century and early 21 st century (McLean and Kench, 2015; Duvat, 2019) (Fig. 4) .


No wonder, since the atolls have risen with the sea level by accretion of coral debris, a phenomenon that has no reason to stop. The only territories which decreased did so very slightly (- 2% maximum in almost 20 years), which is below the error bars. There is no risk that these islands will disappear and that the populations will be forced to flee, on the contrary, contrary to the fantasies repeated in all the newspapers!

moreover, the population of the Maldives has continued to increase; and faster and faster. Obviously an important resource is tourism, and they have absolutely no interest in people stopping air travel, quite the contrary - it would completely drain their economy, unlike the rising waters.

Moreover, they are not asking that we stop plane travel, just that we reimburse them for the damage - imaginary - that the RC would have caused them. That way they win on both counts. Smart people, I tell you ...
0 x
To pass for an idiot in the eyes of a fool is a gourmet pleasure. (Georges COURTELINE)

Mééé denies nui went to parties with 200 people and was not even sick moiiiiiii (Guignol des bois)
User avatar
Exnihiloest
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5365
Registration: 21/04/15, 17:57
x 660

Re: The fable of anthropogenic warming, the return




by Exnihiloest » 07/09/21, 19:40

ABC2019 wrote:...
No wonder, since the atolls have risen with the sea level by accretion of coral debris, a phenomenon that has no reason to stop. ...

Sure, but that's not what Wikipedia tells us:
"People who live on atolls have to cope with [...] rising sea levels. Healthy corals are normally able to compensate for this rise," but global climate change and ocean pollution combine to reduce this capacity".
I suppose that environmental disinformers have gone through this sowing their doom and gloom.

So not only in practice does warming have no effect on the atolls, but neither does the pollution of the oceans, nor the hypothetical acidification of the oceans.
The fables fall one after the other.
0 x
User avatar
GuyGadeboisTheBack
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 14823
Registration: 10/12/20, 20:52
Location: 04
x 4302

Re: The fable of anthropogenic warming, the return




by GuyGadeboisTheBack » 07/09/21, 19:42

Exnihiloest wrote:So not only in practice does warming have no effect on the atolls, but neither does the pollution of the oceans, nor the hypothetical acidification of the oceans.
The fables fall one after the other.<<< Only in your sick head ...

Go take your herbal tea instead of unlocking it. (Soon it will come out that chemical pollution will promote the appearance of new mutant species and that this will be beneficial to biodiversity ... don't laugh, it is capable of it ...)
0 x
phil59
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 2212
Registration: 09/02/20, 10:42
x 504

Re: The fable of anthropogenic warming, the return




by phil59 » 07/09/21, 21:27

When will you receive messages without insulting others?
reptile you are ...
0 x
hmmmmm, hmmmmmmmmmmmmm, hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhmmmmmmmmm, huh, hmmmmmmmmmmmmm.

: Oops: : Cry: :( : Shock:
User avatar
GuyGadeboisTheBack
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 14823
Registration: 10/12/20, 20:52
Location: 04
x 4302

Re: The fable of anthropogenic warming, the return




by GuyGadeboisTheBack » 07/09/21, 22:59

phil59 wrote:When will you receive messages without insulting others?
reptile you are ...

Calmos ...
Image
0 x
ABC2019
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 12927
Registration: 29/12/19, 11:58
x 1008

Re: The fable of anthropogenic warming, the return




by ABC2019 » 07/09/21, 23:57

Exnihiloest wrote:
ABC2019 wrote:...
No wonder, since the atolls have risen with the sea level by accretion of coral debris, a phenomenon that has no reason to stop. ...

Sure, but that's not what Wikipedia tells us:
"People who live on atolls have to cope with [...] rising sea levels. Healthy corals are normally able to compensate for this rise," but global climate change and ocean pollution combine to reduce this capacity".
I suppose that environmental disinformers have gone through this sowing their doom and gloom.

So not only in practice does warming have no effect on the atolls, but neither does the pollution of the oceans, nor the hypothetical acidification of the oceans.
The fables fall one after the other.


ah the disappearing corals, still a whole story ...

https://www.skynews.com.au/opinion/andr ... b17755ee86
0 x
To pass for an idiot in the eyes of a fool is a gourmet pleasure. (Georges COURTELINE)

Mééé denies nui went to parties with 200 people and was not even sick moiiiiiii (Guignol des bois)
phil59
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 2212
Registration: 09/02/20, 10:42
x 504

Re: The fable of anthropogenic warming, the return




by phil59 » 08/09/21, 20:16

GuyGadeboisLeRetour wrote:
phil59 wrote:When will you receive messages without insulting others?
reptile you are ...

Calmos ...
Image


it just confirms what I'm saying.

THANK YOU !
0 x
hmmmmm, hmmmmmmmmmmmmm, hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhmmmmmmmmm, huh, hmmmmmmmmmmmmm.

: Oops: : Cry: :( : Shock:
User avatar
GuyGadeboisTheBack
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 14823
Registration: 10/12/20, 20:52
Location: 04
x 4302

Re: The fable of anthropogenic warming, the return




by GuyGadeboisTheBack » 08/09/21, 20:36

You're welcome, but don't forget to take them, especially.
0 x
User avatar
Exnihiloest
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5365
Registration: 21/04/15, 17:57
x 660

Re: The fable of anthropogenic warming, the return




by Exnihiloest » 08/09/21, 21:24

After the atolls which do not stop increasing, here is that the fable of the years always hotter than the years before, also withers:

49th out of 363.
The 49 years with summer temperatures equal to or above 2021 in central England :

1666 16.7
1676 16.8
1707 16.3
1719 16.7
1728 16.4
1733 16.5
1736 16.6
1747 16.6
1759 16.5
1762 16.7
1772 16.4
1775 16.4
1778 16.5
1779 16.6
1781 17.0
1783 16.5
1794 16.4
1798 16.5
1808 16.6
1818 16.6
1826 17.6
1831 16.3
1846 17.1
1857 16.5
1859 16.4
1868 16.9
1893 16.5
1899 16.9
1911 17.0
1933 17.0
1935 16.3
1947 17.0
1949 16.5
1955 16.5
1959 16.6
1975 16.9
1976 17.8
1983 17.1
1984 16.3
1989 16.5
1995 17.4
1997 16.6
2003 17.3
2006 17.2
2013 16.3
2016 16.4
2018 17.3
2019 16.3
2021 16.3
https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/hadobs/had ... T_mean.txt
0 x

 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Back to "humanitarian disasters, natural, climatic and industrial"

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 97 guests