Remundo wrote:indeed ABC2019 alias Gilles le forumbenevolent compulsive had announced that Russia would get bogged down in Ukraine.
ah good? and in which post I "announced" that?
Remundo wrote:indeed ABC2019 alias Gilles le forumbenevolent compulsive had announced that Russia would get bogged down in Ukraine.
ABC2019 wrote:Christophe wrote:(yes yes yes we know all you are going to say: it's that 2200 dead on D-Day...pov type! There were indeed 5000 dead in 2 days and more than 13 during the whole landing battle... .
except that you said 10 dead on D-Day and you just realized that it was a big c...ie ... after of course you can insult those who point it out to you, when you're brat we blow our noses...
after you compare the number of dead on the most intense day of the Battle of Normandy, in a region where the Germans had concentrated an unprecedented fire force, to the number of dead in ONE strike, in a day that is not supposed be a paroxysmal attack, far from the front, so inevitably the comparison is biased. In this kind of stupid account, no terrorist attack is serious except perhaps those of September 11 since they are far from making 2000 deaths per day.
Estimates of civilian losses already range from more than 4000 confirmed to 10 to 30 potential depending on the sources, therefore largely of the same order of magnitude as the landing.
But comparing a war against the Nazi occupiers who had already caused tens of millions of victims in Europe, to the aggression of a sovereign country which had in no way threatened Russia, is also nonsense. By dint of taking stupid comparisons we can justify what we want.
ABC2019 wrote:completely mired in raspoutitsa poor Moreau, as he can no longer speak of Russian victories, he goes around in circles in his anti-European obsessions
much more detailed analyzes here, and other images that Mr. Moreau drooling in his office ...
ABC2019 wrote:Still happy that the Russians have some victories, they are already ridiculous enough like that to trample for 2 months against a country 6 times less populated, which captures more material from them than they lose and made them lose several ships and high ranks... so whenever they have something to display, they won't hesitate to highlight it.
ABC2019 wrote:To have taken two months to conquer Mariupol for one of the strongest armies in the world, while they were fighting virtually unsupported, is nothing short of a feat. But it must be recognized that the Russians do not have much to put in their mouths, and that it is necessary to make people forget the inglorious withdrawal from kyiv and the loss of their flagship.
In the absence of thrushes....
ABC2019 wrote:Remundo wrote:indeed ABC2019 alias Gilles le forumbenevolent compulsive had announced that Russia would get bogged down in Ukraine.
ah good? and in which post I "announced" that?
ABC2019 wrote:according to the website https://www.oryxspioenkop.com/2022/02/a ... pment.html
the Russian losses documented by photos are 562 tanks, and this is a minimum since it only counts the losses proven by images. And the Ukrainians would have recovered more Russian tanks than they lost.
At this rate, we can be quite confident that the war will be over before May 9, 2023.
Obamot wrote:He comes to quibble by catching hold of the branches, but he perfectly meets all the criteria of the “cretin” that he describes above!
ABC2019 wrote:in the fall, at this rate of destruction, the Russian army will crawl through the mud. Ukraine has more equipment than at the beginning of the war, and will have more and more, with soldiers trained in the use of Western weapons.
But hey, continue to act autistic by watching your propaganda videos
Back to "humanitarian disasters, natural, climatic and industrial"
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 117 guests