Scientists, deniers risk convicts

Humanitarian catastrophes (including resource wars and conflicts), natural, climate and industrial (except nuclear or oil forum fossil and nuclear energy). Pollution of the sea and oceans.
dedeleco
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 9211
Registration: 16/01/10, 01:19
x 10




by dedeleco » 23/10/12, 19:24

Christophe wrote:Let us not forget to also condemn all the doctors who did not make, or not on time, the correct diagnosis ... well there it was humor (gray) but I knew for example, a real crook dentist , which deliberately destroys the teeth of its patients ... and which takes 2 to 3 times more sessions for the same care as the "competition" ...


Incredible, to denounce in public, to the order of dentists, and to be condemned, in court !!

This kind of scammer, harmful, thrives, because nobody dares to pin him, with the courage to risk a defamation lawsuit, for the victims, only able to corner him with evidence, if they have the courage.
Gaston asks himself the basic question:
In fact, this is what dedeleco wants: that we evacuate all risk areas preventively and definitively


In the meantime, we could have our homes everywhere seismic-proof, (more scrapped correct) our houses, quickly shut down all French nuclear power plants, like the Germans, and in return quickly develop systems at a lower cost. www.dlsc.ca , solar heat stored for the winter, provide more flood protection, such as having an inflatable raft in each floodable house, etc.
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79356
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 11059




by Christophe » 23/10/12, 21:24

I saw the report on FR2's newscast ... in fact "everything" comes from a press conference filmed a few days before the disaster where the scientists in question showed a lack of humility towards mother Nature....

In the meantime Italy no longer has a seismic monitoring network because all the directors have resigned (and we all know that there are only the directors who work eh ...) : Cheesy:
0 x
User avatar
Gaston
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 1910
Registration: 04/10/10, 11:37
x 88




by Gaston » 24/10/12, 08:39

Christophe wrote: (and we all know that there are only directors who work eh ...) : Cheesy:
Not necessarily, but they are the only ones authorized to sign a report.

So the seismic monitoring network continues to work but no longer provides any information to the authorities : Mrgreen:
0 x
User avatar
Gaston
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 1910
Registration: 04/10/10, 11:37
x 88




by Gaston » 24/10/12, 08:46

dedeleco wrote:In the meantime, we could have anti-seismic everywhere built ((more scrapped ok) our houses
This is exactly what the condemned scientists were advocating ...

At the end of the meeting of March 31, 2009, the Italian 'major risks' Commission wrote:that it was not possible to predict the possible occurrence of a stronger earthquake, but had recommended to comply more with earthquake prevention measures, in particular in the construction of buildings.


The president of the Italian 'big risks' Commission, Luciano Maiani wrote:Scientists are condemned when there has been no investigation against those who built inappropriately in a seismic area.
0 x
dedeleco
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 9211
Registration: 16/01/10, 01:19
x 10




by dedeleco » 24/10/12, 09:25

The merit of this court decision is:
A well posed problem is half solved !!!

responsibility of all, us, our habits, our policies, mafias and scientists, to be well aware!
0 x
User avatar
Gaston
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 1910
Registration: 04/10/10, 11:37
x 88




by Gaston » 24/10/12, 09:58

dedeleco wrote:The merit of this court decision is:
A well posed problem is half solved !!!
I do not agree.
On the contrary, only scientists have been held responsible for the disaster.
All the others :
dedeleco wrote:us, our habits, our policies, mafias
are encouraged to continue as before.
0 x
dedeleco
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 9211
Registration: 16/01/10, 01:19
x 10




by dedeleco » 24/10/12, 11:05

Yes, but we talk about it everywhere and therefore the problem is much more open and better posed, of the absurdity very visible by all !!!
0 x
User avatar
Gaston
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 1910
Registration: 04/10/10, 11:37
x 88




by Gaston » 24/10/12, 11:43

The end justifies the means :?:

For a real problem to come to the fore, did it have to be wrongly condemned through :?:
It would no doubt have been less publicized (and more complicated) to condemn the companies which had built in violation of existing regulations.

In any case, we are moving away from the title of "denial scientists" :|
This Article also sheds a different light on the statements of scientists ...
0 x
dedeleco
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 9211
Registration: 16/01/10, 01:19
x 10




by dedeleco » 30/10/12, 01:35

A reality forgotten by Obamot in Geneva, a place as dangerous as Japan:
a tsunami in the year 563 in Lake Geneva 13 meters high, following an enormous landslide:

http://phys.org/news/2012-10-tsunami-ge ... tists.html
0 x
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538




by Obamot » 30/10/12, 13:17

: Arrowd: : Arrowd: : Arrowd:
0 x

 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Back to "humanitarian disasters, natural, climatic and industrial"

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 133 guests