Janic wrote:you must have misread the article you are quoting then!"Feeding the land between two cultures is what peasants have been doing for millennia. But these practices are now threatened by agricultural methanization."
https://lejournalminimal.fr/confisquer- ... ourriture/
It is perfectly clear.
On the one hand, green people are finding that methanization is a problem:
"In the past, between two cultures to feed humans, one intercropped to feed Nature! It was intercropping, an ancestral technique that allowed peasants, with manure and the recycling of all organic matter, the rotations and fallow land, to protect and enhance their land. But now, our rulers want to use the plants from these crops to make gas! "
https://lejournalminimal.fr/confisquer- ... ourriture/
These eco-clowns accuse the government while it is their clan that the government has followed, through the ecological transition!
And I prove it. Because before this observation, other eco-clowns have been there, who thoroughly promote anaerobic digestion:
"From an economic point of view, the integration of anaerobic digestion into production systems must represent an opportunity for the farm to gain autonomy by reducing its dependence on inputs, or even on energy, and to participate in reducing its costs. "
"Anaerobic digestion should make it possible to significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions compared to a fossil energy production sector and contribute to reducing emissions from the agricultural sector."
...
WWF, March 2020 report
Is there only one opinion here on "intercropping", "rotations", "fallows", "recycling of all organic materials"? On these risks of anaerobic digestion?
No.
Result: a denial, "it is the fault of the government"; the usual ecological irresponsibility, always asking for one thing and its opposite, they do not assume any of their bullshit.
