Obamot wrote:In figures STP: What are the tolerated VS acceptable methane emissions in breeding per thousand head of cattle?
I admit I don't understand the question ...
Can you explain?
Obamot wrote:In figures STP: What are the tolerated VS acceptable methane emissions in breeding per thousand head of cattle?
No, my question is relevant BECAUSE THIS PROVES THAT YOU TAKE A POSITION IN THE PIFOMETER FILES, WITHOUT TAKING CARE OF EXAMINING THE PROBLEM, SO OR THE CAUSES OR THE CONSEQUENCES FOR THE BREEDERS, YOU WHO ARE NOT VEGETARIAN AND THERE TO TREAT OTHERS OF IDEOLOGISTS ... WHAT A CULOTExnihiloest wrote:Obamot wrote:...
In figures STP: What are the tolerated VS acceptable methane emissions in breeding per thousand head of cattle?
Just so that we understand something A YOUR ARTICLE, and based on the tangible.
Like I said, it's up to you to find out. And amha, you did not leave the hostel because your question is based on unrealized innuendos, such as the fact that there would be objective criteria for the tolerance and acceptability of the programs.
I'm not going to take everyone who needs numbers by the hand.
I have only observed that those who complain about "agricultural methanization" are those who have motivated it.
You are of course free to go beyond the subject.
GuyGadeboisLeRetour wrote:Exnihiloest wrote:I have only observed that those who complain about "agricultural methanization" are those who have motivated it.
No. You made a selection bias to fuel and disseminate your hatred of ecology.
Methanization is not just cultivated areas on purpose (bullshit, I agree), it is also the recovery of waste that until then went to the incinerator and a lot of small farms with plant biomass and / or animal heretofore not or misused. In short, you don't care about the world, as with your heatwave of the XNUMXth century.
Exnihiloest wrote:Cretinerie, stupidity, debility, antiquity, lies, partiality, filthy bullshit
I don't have to waste my time with bad faith people.
you must have misread the article you are quoting then!"Feeding the land between two cultures is what peasants have been doing for millennia. But these practices are now threatened by agricultural methanization."
https://lejournalminimal.fr/confisquer- ... our writing /
Ahmed wrote:The main concern in this approach of "small solutions" is that they quickly degenerate and that from virtuous, they become unfortunate. Thus, the manufacture of pellets initially responded to the use of a waste (sawdust), but given the success of its use, it is now entire forests that have passed through the "mill" ... Anaerobic digestion responds to this scheme and it is to be feared that the work that is done to recover green waste in gardens * will turn into raw material for the LNG industry when the infrastructure is in place ...
Back to "humanitarian disasters, natural, climatic and industrial"
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 99 guests