Coronavirus, who or what and why? What origin?

[GuyGadebois]

It's getting worse with you. Do you need these mantras to keep convincing yourself? Mad refrain, recited as if to speak to idiots who aligns clichés on clichés ??? Are you in a trance?

[Obamot]

There it is more vaping, and he contnue his circus to post links without making the slightest comment ...

Note that it's better, because when you read the comments ...

[VetusLignum]

Special Vetus

self-censored

[izentrop]

Self-censoring is reigning in ignorance, right?

[GuyGadebois]

Self-censoring is reigning in ignorance, right?

No, it's the opposite. Self-censorship is a sign of good mental health.

[Obamot]

Self-censoring is reigning in ignorance, right?

No, it's the opposite. Self-censorship is a sign of good mental health.

Yes, there are some who should follow this example to avoid posting stupid stuff and videos. And then it's stronger than them, after they need to ask questions to reassure themselves

[VetusLignum]

Norwegian virologist Birger Sørensen joins the ranks of those who believe that SARS-CoV-2 comes from a laboratory.

“The properties that we now see in the virus, we have yet to discover anywhere in nature. We know that these properties make the virus very infectious, so if it came from nature, there should also be many animals infected with this, but we have still not been able to trace the virus in nature.

“The only place we are aware of where an equivalent virus to that which causes Covid-19 exists, is in a laboratory. So the simplest and most logical explanation is that it comes from a laboratory. Those who claim otherwise, have the burden of proof, ”Sørensen says.

https://www.minervanett.no/corona/the-m ... Qe_7u4Bjdo

[Obamot]

Norwegian virologist Birger Sørensen joins the ranks of those who believe that SARS-CoV-2 comes from a laboratory.

“The properties that we now see in the virus, we have yet to discover anywhere in nature. We know that these properties make the virus very infectious, so if it came from nature, there should also be many animals infected with this, but we have still not been able to trace the virus in nature.

“The only place we are aware of where an equivalent virus to that which causes Covid-19 exists, is in a laboratory. So the simplest and most logical explanation is that it comes from a laboratory. Those who claim otherwise, have the burden of proof, ”Sørensen says.

https://www.minervanett.no/corona/the-m ... Qe_7u4Bjdo

It is not trivial that the only researchers “who dare to speak”Are those who are retired or at the end of their career!

Have you noticed?

( and the more recent, the more interesting => July 02, 2020)

[Christophe]

WHO investigates ... the origin of the virus in China a heavy investigation made up of a team ... of 2 experts

https://www.20minutes.fr/monde/2819871- ... irus-chine

Coronavirus: Washington welcomes WHO investigation into the origins of the virus in China

Two experts from the World Health Organization are expected this weekend in Beijing

A little light right?

[VetusLignum]

Norwegian virologist Birger Sørensen joins the ranks of those who believe that SARS-CoV-2 comes from a laboratory.

“The properties that we now see in the virus, we have yet to discover anywhere in nature. We know that these properties make the virus very infectious, so if it came from nature, there should also be many animals infected with this, but we have still not been able to trace the virus in nature.

“The only place we are aware of where an equivalent virus to that which causes Covid-19 exists, is in a laboratory. So the simplest and most logical explanation is that it comes from a laboratory. Those who claim otherwise, have the burden of proof, ”Sørensen says.

https://www.minervanett.no/corona/the-m ... Qe_7u4Bjdo

It is not trivial that the only researchers “who dare to speak”Are those who are retired or at the end of their career!

Have you noticed?

It is explained in the article: researchers fear losing their funding, or the authorization to conduct their research

“Nobody wants to put forward the inconvenient truth, many scientists are also concerned about their own funding and position if they were to put forward such a controversial hypothesis, Sørensen elaborates. It is nevertheless a fact that many people on the web have engaged in such a debate. But so far, those who participate in such forums are characterized as conspiratorial. It is also the case that a debate about this type of viral research and the technologies used may damage reputation and lead to new restrictions on how to conduct molecular genetic research. With this in mind, it is not difficult to see that it must be difficult to get accepted papers in peer reviewed journals that focus on such research.

(read the article, it contains a lot of new information about the virus)