well, no need for a reason, just the real facts are enough by being in good faith. No blabla.Exnihiloest wrote:No sequitur. Still no reason for you.
And I advise you to stop, because the other thread was locked, when he insulted me for having revealed that he was the one who truncated his pseudo justifications, and with the greatest dishonesty since practicing the inversion accusatory, accusing me of the facts of which he is the cause
(as I was laying out the chronology facts) >