Coronavirus, who or what and why? What origin?

Humanitarian catastrophes (including resource wars and conflicts), natural, climate and industrial (except nuclear or oil forum fossil and nuclear energy). Pollution of the sea and oceans.
User avatar
GuyGadeboisTheBack
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 14823
Registration: 10/12/20, 20:52
Location: 04
x 4302

Re: Coronavirus, who or what and why? What origin?




by GuyGadeboisTheBack » 22/02/22, 22:01

Image
Screenshot 2022-02-22 at 21-58-58 Coronavirus, whose fault or what and why What origin - Page 157.png
Screenshot 2022-02-22 at 21-58-58 Coronavirus, whose fault or what and why What origin - Page 157.png (297.4 KiB) Viewed 1586 times

Image
0 x
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538

Re: Coronavirus, who or what and why? What origin?




by Obamot » 22/02/22, 22:04

Damn, I changed browser, the time I put my PW... too late, your message in the face, ouch ouch

I read if I want...

Image

I didn't understand anything...
0 x
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538

Re: Coronavirus, who or what and why? What origin?




by Obamot » 22/02/22, 22:08

BANK!

129746ED-5328-45A4-8586-BDA71E7548AA.jpeg
129746ED-5328-45A4-8586-BDA71E7548AA.jpeg (124.62 KiB) Viewed 1570 times
0 x
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538

Re: Coronavirus, who or what and why? What origin?




by Obamot » 18/03/22, 12:53

717A9BE7-C9DB-4E97-B0BA-A18E56CC0238.jpeg

The Tweet had already posted, natural-human-disasters / coronavirus-fault-for-who-or-what-and-why-and-why-t16346-1550.html # p492272 but here are the details.
Since the start of the Covid crisis, Alexandra Henrion-Caude, geneticist and specialist in epigenetics and RNA, former director of research at Inserm, likes to seek answers when she asks herself questions, even if it means displease.

“A scientist who says she has “lost everything”, but who remains tenacious”
Even if his questions, his works and his affirmations about the human origin of the virus have earned him criticism and censure at a time when it was not appropriate to issue such hypotheses or arguments yet today considered officially as plausible, it continues its scientific research on Covid-19.
Recently, it was an international study published in Frontiers in Virology that caught his attention, published by several scientists who were surprised by the presence of the PRRA sequence in the RNA of SARS-CoV-2 and who wondered about the reason for this inclusion.

Public data
The study scientists did a blast. That is to say, they “searched for homology with all the sequences that exist”, in other words, the resemblance with other sequences accessible to everyone in public databases. They then discovered that the PRRA sequence corresponded to the sequence ID11652 patented in 2017 by Moderna, under the reference US 958 7003. Among the 13 inventors, Stéphane Bancel, CEO of Moderna, a pharmaceutical laboratory which, it should be remembered, provides the international vaccines against Covid-19…

7BA405FB-2620-4A84-8154-9F11EF1CD316.png
7BA405FB-2620-4A84-8154-9F11EF1CD316.png (114.69 Kio) Consulté 1291 fois


Official information, not validated by the principal concerned
Those who are used to using the term “conspiracy theorists” all over the place be reassured. This information circulated among the mainstream media such as the American newspaper Daily Mail. On February 24, 2022, Stéphane Bancel replied to a Fox News journalist who asked him why a sequence patented by his pharmaceutical laboratory had been found in the RNA of SARS-CoV-2 that “scientists are analyzing whether these data are real or not”. He does not exclude "the hypothesis of the accidental laboratory escape" and the virus which would have escaped from that of Wuhan in China during research on the gains of function. If he had spoken these words at the start of the Covid crisis, would he have been censored as Alexandra Henrion-Caude was?… In any case, it is surprising that such information, if it is not don't kill, don't make the headlines...


According to the details above, Alexandra Henrion-Caude does not say carabistouilles, from a legal point of view, the date of the patent filing is authentic.

This confirms the confessions of the NIH-USA on the manipulations made at the P4 lab in Wuhan (in 2018) on covid19 (SARS-cov-X/2)
What overlaps with this natural-human-disasters/coronavirus-whose-or-what-and-why-is-fault-t16346-1280.html?hilit=fuellmich#p456744

And therefore in addition, the labs would have agreed between them? (if so, more and more serious).

Here's more that confirms that the covid19, should in fact be called COVID17... : Evil: if so (and until proven otherwise) that proves that there would really (was) a conspiracy. Can't wait for a thorough investigation to unravel all this and for a prosecutor to take over the file to tell us.

Suite: https://www.nexus.fr/actualite/entretie ... ion-caude/

A sequence patented by Moderna found in the RNA of SARS-CoV-2! Alexandra Henrion-Caude's analysis (uncensored)
MARCH 14, 2022
Alexandra Henrion-Caude, geneticist and RNA specialist, explains to the Nexus microphone the results of an unpublished study published in Frontiers in Virology, February 21, 2022, reporting a complete match between a piece of SARS sequence -CoV-2 and a Moderna patent filed in 2017.
1 x
VetusLignum
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 1690
Registration: 27/11/18, 23:38
x 760

Re: Coronavirus, who or what and why? What origin?




by VetusLignum » 15/04/22, 12:00

A priori, the theory of Luc Montagnier, that there are insertions resulting from AIDS in SARS-CoV2 which are not natural, is in the process of being confirmed. The aim would have been to make the virus sensitive to a certain class of inhibitors.
The Fort Detrick hypothesis also seems revived.
https://pgibertie.com/2022/04/12/scoop- ... er-daszac/
1 x
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538

Re: Coronavirus, who or what and why? What origin?




by Obamot » 15/04/22, 13:23

VetusLignum wrote:A priori, the theory of Luc Montagnier, that there are insertions resulting from AIDS in SARS-CoV2 which are not natural, is in the process of being confirmed. The aim would have been to make the virus sensitive to a certain class of inhibitors.
The Fort Detrick hypothesis also seems revived.
https://pgibertie.com/2022/04/12/scoop- ... er-daszac/
If so, if it turns out that there was “willful intent to harm” this falls under criminal justice and crimes against humanity (without wanting to go too far, already proven in the case of the “gain of function” implementing the protein spike to the virus, in this case aggravating circumstance/s)
0 x
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538

Re: Coronavirus, who or what and why? What origin?




by Obamot » 05/05/22, 23:04

Well... Bill Gates which announces new viruses to us: more contagious and deadly (while he can't know, unless?)

What will he reveal tomorrow in the newspaper?

0 x
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 19224
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: bourgogne
x 3491

Re: Coronavirus, who or what and why? What origin?




by Janic » 06/05/22, 08:18

It goes wrong, then!
0 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538

Re: Coronavirus, who or what and why? What origin?




by Obamot » 06/05/22, 10:17

Janic wrote:It goes wrong, then!
Bill Gates indeed... : Mrgreen:

I don't expect too much from journalists, but with his quest for notoriety, he is pushed to say more than he would like... To be blinded by his prerogatives and projects, and to make revelations without his knowledge. voluntarily ...

He who has invested billions in vaccines, for example, he has already declared: “that the vaccines did not work and that we had to move on”

It can happen again...
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79120
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 10973

Re: Coronavirus, who or what and why? What origin?




by Christophe » 08/06/22, 12:26

0 x

Back to "humanitarian disasters, natural, climatic and industrial"

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : gegyx and 112 guests