Chernobyl children (Niels Ackermann, Switzerland reportage in Slavutych)

Humanitarian catastrophes (including resource wars and conflicts), natural, climate and industrial (except nuclear or oil forum fossil and nuclear energy). Pollution of the sea and oceans.
izentrop
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 13716
Registration: 17/03/14, 23:42
Location: picardie
x 1524
Contact :

Re: Children of Chernobyl (Niels Ackermann, Switzerland reportage in Slavutych)




by izentrop » 04/06/16, 00:17

Ok thank you janic
obamot wrote:And so that gives well 250 deaths, directly linked to the irradiation suffered by the "liquidators".
More than Greenpeace's figure:
The number of deaths directly attributable to radioactivity varies between 9, according to the report prepared in 000 by several UN agencies under the leadership of the IAEA, and 2006 according to Greenpeace.
http://www.ladocumentationfrancaise.fr/ ... -ans-apres
0 x
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538

Re: Children of Chernobyl (Niels Ackermann, Switzerland reportage in Slavutych)




by Obamot » 04/06/16, 02:37

Mid-to-j. in 2007 = obsolete.
0 x
izentrop
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 13716
Registration: 17/03/14, 23:42
Location: picardie
x 1524
Contact :

Re: Children of Chernobyl (Niels Ackermann, Switzerland reportage in Slavutych)




by izentrop » 04/06/16, 12:16

Obamot wrote:Mid-to-j. in 2007 = obsolete.
Calculations or reality your 250000 dead?
I suspect that for you it is a nuclear lobby site:
According to a United Nations report, the number of unambiguously enumerated deaths, generally occurring shortly after the accident, in 2005 was less than 50. As for deaths that occur years after exposure to radioactivity, we are reduced to calculating the number because we do not have "signature" to identify them.

Twenty years after the disaster, the human toll of Chernobyl therefore remains the subject of fierce debate. A report published by the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) in September 2005 thus sparked controversy. This report is the result of a forum in which, from 2003 to 2005, organizations as respected and competent as the WHO (World Health Organization), UNSCEAR, IAEA and FAO participated.

The report puts the number of cancer deaths, actual or future, at 4.000 in the most exposed populations in Ukraine, Belarus and Russia. The calculation is based on the assumption that the probability of death due to radioactivity is proportional to the dose. Among the 4000 deaths, 2200 deaths could occur among the liquidators, 1500 among the inhabitants of the most contaminated areas, 150 among the 150 evacuees from the 000 km area

These considerable figures provided by the competent bodies are much lower than certain estimates popularized by the press and television. They are denounced by anti-nuclear movements as part of a campaign of disinformation "insulting the victims".
http://www.laradioactivite.com/site/pages/Querelledechiffres.htm
Image
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79360
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 11060

Re: Children of Chernobyl (Niels Ackermann, Switzerland reportage in Slavutych)




by Christophe » 04/06/16, 13:41

Obamot wrote:
Between city and countryside, Slavoutych is surrounded by a forest famous for its mushrooms.


lol


This remark made me laugh too!
0 x
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538

Re: Children of Chernobyl (Niels Ackermann, Switzerland reportage in Slavutych)




by Obamot » 04/06/16, 19:08

Izentrop, who persists in wanting to rely only on figures based on a corpus dating before the discovery of DNA, wrote:
Obamot wrote:Mid-to-j. in 2007 = obsolete.
Calculations or reality [...]?

Continue indefinitely your hypotheses built around theories of the early fifties, and the answer will always be invariably kif-kif:

Obsolete!
0 x

 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Back to "humanitarian disasters, natural, climatic and industrial"

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 132 guests