Chernobyl: the nature she already takes her rights?

Humanitarian catastrophes (including resource wars and conflicts), natural, climate and industrial (except nuclear or oil forum fossil and nuclear energy). Pollution of the sea and oceans.
Nico37
I learn econologic
I learn econologic
posts: 30
Registration: 02/08/20, 17:35
x 7

Re: Chernobyl: does nature take back its rights?




by Nico37 » 04/08/20, 22:55

Chernobyl fire: record fires wreak havoc on forest ecosystem 13/06 with AFP

A quarter of the forest area surrounding the former Chernobyl nuclear power plant was devastated by flames. A blow to the local ecosystem that has thrived since the disaster of 1986

"This forest will never be reborn," regrets scientist Oleksandre Borsouk, walking on yellow earth, among charred pine trunks and the smell of burning in the exclusion zone around the Chernobyl power plant, after record fires. These fires of unprecedented magnitude devastated a quarter of this area, says Oleksandre Borsouk, one of the managers of the nature reserve which occupies most of this vast territory. Still contaminated by radiation, this largely abandoned area surrounds the damaged power station within a radius of 30 kilometers, the scene in 1986 of the worst nuclear accident in history.

(...)
2 x
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538

Re: Chernobyl: does nature take back its rights?




by Obamot » 06/08/20, 11:15

France should pass a law to prohibit radioactive clouds from overflying France:
Low dose irradiation problem, fixed! : Wink: Only water vapor would have the right to pass. : Cheesy:

Among the million low-dose irradiated people who died over 1 century, 100% of the deaths ”will have tried their luck"

Yes Guy, everything is “under control”!
0 x
izentrop
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 13644
Registration: 17/03/14, 23:42
Location: picardie
x 1502
Contact :

Re: Chernobyl: does nature take back its rights?




by izentrop » 06/08/20, 15:05

Nico37 wrote:"This forest will never be reborn", regrets scientist Oleksandre Borsouk
It is interesting to know why
scientists point the finger at climate change which has resulted in an unusually hot and dry winter with only 63% precipitation above the norm, creating favorable conditions for the fire to spread.
It will be reborn automatically if there is sufficient precipitation, but the RC compromises all that.
Europe is heating up faster and faster, especially inland
Our geographic area has warmed by around 2 ° C since the pre-industrial period, compared to 1,1 ° C for the global average. As predicted by climatologists, global warming is felt more strongly on the continents than on the oceans and near the coasts. https://www.lemonde.fr/blog/huet/2020/0 ... plus-vite/
0 x
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538

Re: Chernobyl: does nature take back its rights?




by Obamot » 06/08/20, 20:25

izentrop wrote:
Nico37 wrote:"This forest will never be reborn", regrets scientist Oleksandre Borsouk
It is interesting to know why

In case you forgot it:
- One of the reactors at the Chernobyl plant exploded in 1986.
- Nearly 100 sappers were then sacrificed to prevent a second reactor from being destroyed too ...!
- In 2000/2001 Kofi Annan, then Secretary-General of the United Nations declared that there were 9 million victims of ionizing radiation caused by the explosion and the fire of the atomic reactor at Chernobyl, and this number has not stopped growing since women irradiated or affected by low dose irradiation continue to give birth to human beings with malformations ... The fire only reminds us that the weather phenomena have never happened stopped since the disaster and that all of Europe has continued to be contaminated, year after year, to varying degrees ...

Source: OCHA Report to the United Nations, 2000, and Zupka D.; in OCHA Report, 2001 to the Chernobyl Conference in Kiev, 12.08. 2001

But I am grateful to you for not ceasing to make us “laugh”, by your childish but oh so staggering words.
It would be even funnier if it weren't for all those deaths!
0 x
izentrop
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 13644
Registration: 17/03/14, 23:42
Location: picardie
x 1502
Contact :

Re: Chernobyl: does nature take back its rights?




by izentrop » 06/08/20, 20:29

0 x
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538

Re: Chernobyl: does nature take back its rights?




by Obamot » 06/08/20, 20:46

Thank you for posting this link which demonstrates the harmful effects of low-dose irradiation ... (This same link that you contested 4 years ago) : Mrgreen:

The report announced 1 million victims over 70 years ...

We're close to 10 million 30 years later ...

As you say: "for those who don't know“Like you for example! : roll:

But keep it up, you're the squadron leader : Cheesy:
0 x
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538

Re: Chernobyl: does nature take back its rights?




by Obamot » 05/01/22, 14:21

izentrop wrote:For those who don't know https://www.unscear.org/unscear/en/chernobyl.html

More than five years after your son, and more than 35 years after the disaster, nature still does not take back its rights, and in particular as proof, humans have still not been able to return to the place ...



Of stupidity to eat his dog because he would be hungry : Shock:
0 x
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 19224
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: bourgogne
x 3491

Re: Chernobyl: does nature take back its rights?




by Janic » 05/01/22, 14:48

obamot
More than five years after your son, and more than 35 years after the disaster, nature still does not take back its rights, and in particular as proof, humans have still not been able to return to the premises ...
let's go, let's go Obamot, you forgot the magic phrase; 'there is no scientific evidence"and that says it all! Whew, the funny ones! : Cheesy: : Cheesy: : Cheesy:
1 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538

Re: Chernobyl: does nature take back its rights?




by Obamot » 05/01/22, 15:00

Let Izentrop show us just one double-blind randomized :!: : Idea: : Shock:
0 x
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 19224
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: bourgogne
x 3491

Re: Chernobyl: does nature take back its rights?




by Janic » 05/01/22, 15:08

by Obamot »05/01/22, 16:00
Let Izentrop show us just one double-blind randomized
half "is already done, it is doubly blind ... because on the random side, it is widely supplied : Cheesy: : Cheesy: : Cheesy:
1 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré

Back to "humanitarian disasters, natural, climatic and industrial"

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 121 guests