Wi-Fi, waves and health: danger or not?

How to stay healthy and prevent risks and consequences on your health and public health. occupational disease, industrial risks (asbestos, air pollution, electromagnetic waves ...), company risk (workplace stress, overuse of drugs ...) and individual (tobacco, alcohol ...).
User avatar
Macro
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6459
Registration: 04/12/08, 14:34
x 1610




by Macro » 01/12/11, 15:15

And to say that since 2005 our box was under our bed : Cheesy: : Cheesy: And that Mamita continued to take the pill ...
0 x
The only thing safe in the future. It is that there may chance that it conforms to our expectations ...
dedeleco
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 9211
Registration: 16/01/10, 01:19
x 10




by dedeleco » 01/12/11, 16:27

We did this 12 years ago with incubated chicken eggs !!

There are testimonies of farmers incubating eggs near new antennas for mobiles, losing their chicks !!

And therefore the spermatozoa only confirm actions well below the heating threshold !!
We will wait another 100 years to admit these dangers, as for asbestos !!

Finally Remundo would do well to reflect that if the tension of 0,1V is applied on a membrane of less than 100angström, the microwave field of 46V / mxcircumference of the brain is found whole on this membrane if no luck, exactly as for a transistor which detects very weak fields in our laptops !!

So we have to be very wary of scientific certainties about known biology which is still very very bad (we don't cure cancer properly, the communication code between our neurons is completely unknown and inaccessible, the epigenetic code remains to be discovered)
0 x
User avatar
Macro
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6459
Registration: 04/12/08, 14:34
x 1610




by Macro » 02/12/11, 09:03

A drop in fertility is rather nice since we are too much on our planet.
0 x
The only thing safe in the future. It is that there may chance that it conforms to our expectations ...
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79120
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 10973




by Christophe » 02/12/11, 09:38

dedeleco wrote:We did this 12 years ago with incubated chicken eggs !!

There are testimonies of farmers incubating eggs near new antennas for mobiles, losing their chicks !!


Explained in pictures in this documentary "Mobile phones, all guinea pigs?" dating from the period cited (2002 in fact): https://www.econologie.com/video-telepho ... -2444.html

Debate: https://www.econologie.com/forums/video-tele ... t1592.html

dedeleco wrote:So we have to be very wary of scientific certainties about known biology which is still very very bad (we don't cure cancer properly, the communication code between our neurons is completely unknown and inaccessible, the epigenetic code remains to be discovered)


Here even more than elsewhere it is the principle of precaution / prevention which should apply!

And 3G, which is becoming more and more popular, is much worse, signal strength level than Wifi!

For example: when I activate (extremely rare but it happens) 3G on my netbook, the network on my phone that is next to it, systematically loses 3 or 4 bars ... out of 6 ...

But it is true that some manufacturers are working on the problem and have very low SAR (the Samsung Galaxy S for example) ... at least compared to other models on the market and compared to what is indicated in the instructions or doc. commercial ...

The rule is quite simple: the smaller the antenna (internal for a long time now), the higher its SAR will be at the same signal strength and info rate ...

For the rest, I refer you to this super guide published by the Belgian federal government: https://www.econologie.com/forums/ondes-elec ... 10188.html

Image

Download here: https://www.econologie.com/guide-champs- ... -4313.html
0 x
dedeleco
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 9211
Registration: 16/01/10, 01:19
x 10




by dedeleco » 02/12/11, 13:00

There are very simple and powerful synthetic common sense arguments that are never said or written !!

Life shows living things detecting ultra weak physical effects, as chemical sensitivity (odors or hormones) ofa single molecule (butterflies for example), sound with displacement of the eardruman atomic distance, light close to photon, electric (Sharks) microTesla magnetic field (birds, pigeons, bacteria).

Life has been able to detect as well as our most sensitive current instruments, and therefore think and affirm that life cannot do as well as our cell phones, detecting very weak radio waves or microwaves, microvolts, is illogical and absurd at the basic common sense level.

This basic common sense leads to a total doubt that living beings are not disturbed by the waves for laptops !!!

The worst is the transmitting antennas facing the apartments, with pregnant women between 1 and 3 months old, because the fetus at this age around 1 to 3 months is hyper-sensitive to the least disturbances chemicals (even mild painkillers, last night's infrared, cancers and deformities, more sperm) and other microwave hazards, such as future chicks in the eggs.
It is crazy this type of installation, capable of irradiating pregnant women, with power on the antennas of several kW, even stronger than a wide open microwave oven, with broken security !!!

Finally I repeat the basic operating mechanism of laptops on the "membrane" (junction) of transistors:
Finally Remundo would do well to reflect that if the tension of 0,1V is applied on a membrane of less than 100angström, the microwave field of 46V / mxcircumference of the brain is found whole on this membrane if no luck, exactly as for a transistor which detects very weak fields in our laptops !!

I invite to deepen !!
Why do you want biological membranes to be unable to rectify microwave waves like diodes and transistors?
It is frightening that it is never considered !!
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79120
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 10973




by Christophe » 31/05/13, 21:24

Students demonstrate the harmfulness of WiFi waves with frightening results

Like what it is not enough to be a scientist to carry out conclusive experiments. Five Danish high school girls wanted to determine how harmful Wifi waves are on plant development. We let you discover the amazing result of their analysis.

By exposing for six days 6 plates containing watercress seeds to the waves of two WiFi routers of the IEEE 802.11g standard and by isolating 6 other plates from any form of radiation, these young Danish high school girls were able to discover to what extent the effects of Wifi were harmful. As a result of this experiment, the seeds that had been exposed had not developed and even had some mutations. The other half of the watercress, located in the wave-free room, germinated without the slightest concern.

Image

(...)


http://dailygeekshow.com/2013/05/28/des ... -effarants
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79120
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 10973




by Christophe » 27/06/13, 11:45

50% increase in brain tumors in children in the United Kingdom in 10 years + 40% in Denmark, Finland - explosion of the phenomenon in France.

Figures released by the UK Bureau of National Statistics show a 50 percent increase in frontal and temporal lobe tumors in children between 1999 and 2009.

We often hear that if the cellphone was dangerous, the cancer statistics would visibly increase.

We also said that for asbestos, which ceased to be covered by American insurance in 1913! For information, the waves of mobile telephony and Wifi (Wimax and consors) have ceased to be covered by reinsurance companies since 2000 worldwide. Reason: too dangerous.

See the LLoyds report, which in 2010 compared mobile phones to asbestos to justify the absence of insurance coverage

With asbestos, we saw the result in exposed people, especially workers.

An article in Le Figaro from February 2003 revealed that the main world reinsurance companies - in particular LLoyds, Swiss de Ré and Allianz publicly declared that they no longer covered mobile telephony.

Even if, in general, the higher the turnover of a technology, the more difficult it is to demonstrate its toxicity (!), It can now be assumed that mobile telephony, which is therefore no longer covered by any global reinsurance company, although cancer often linked mainly to environmental pollution often takes more than 20 years to appear, is an agent responsible for the resurgence of central nervous system pathologies, such as brain cancer.
Pathologies which are not explained, according to the INVS (in 2006) by any other known factor.


Read the article completed by Le Robin des Toits
http://www.robindestoits.org/Augmentati ... a1717.html

Source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... ancer.html

So another "good reason" to switch everything to RJ45 at home !! Here is all you need: RJ45 cables
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79120
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 10973




by Christophe » 23/07/13, 18:42

0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79120
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 10973




by Christophe » 28/10/13, 17:07

They are odorless and colorless. But are they harmless? Electromagnetic waves are everywhere. Mobile phones, wireless, wi-fi, tablets, game consoles ... And the more radio frequencies invade our daily lives, the more they cause distrust and concern. While telephone operators are rolling out 4G, which allows films to be downloaded to their mobile in a few seconds and serves all rural areas, environmental associations and ecologists are sorry that no health impact study has been carried out. has been launched to date. So as not to annoy the industrialists?

4G means billions of investments, the survival of the three operators closely followed by Free on the mobile market and thousands of jobs. And to reduce the digital divide, which has become a national priority, we will impose on the population a 50% increase in exposure to the waves. How can you be sure that this new technology will have no effect on health? For mayors, the subject has become explosive, especially when approaching the municipal elections. Often questioned as soon as an operator wants to install a relay antenna in front of a crèche or a school, the municipalities prefer to apply the precautionary principle rather than getting angry with their constituents.
The war of the "pro" and "anti-wave"

(...)


Suite: http://tempsreel.nouvelobs.com/l-enquet ... ondes.html

The 14 commandments to protect yourself from electromagnetic waves:

1. Use the mobile phone as little and as little as possible.
2. Avoid keeping a portable cellphone on standby, because it sends, every ten minutes or so, a wave flash to the nearest antenna, day and night.
3. Do not keep a laptop on your bedside table or near your head: the waves emitted interfere with brain waves and can disturb sleep or cause memory loss, headaches, dizziness ...
4. Use the "loudspeaker" mode or a hands-free kit instead. Be careful, the headset reduces exposure but does not cancel it.
5. Change the side of use of the mobile phone, the Interphone study having shown the risks linked to long-term unilateral use.
6. Do not move around by telephoning, even on foot, the mobile transmitting more strongly in order to find the nearest antenna.
7. Avoid telephoning in the car, the waves from the portable, reflected by the metallic structure, being then concentrated in a small space.
8. Do not passively expose neighbors and children without their knowledge: the mobile phone irradiates up to 1,50 meters. This advice is particularly valid for any use in an enclosed environment: bus, train ...
9. For pregnant women, do not wear your handset on your stomach and, more generally, avoid using it as much as possible.
10. For all parents: provide your children with a mobile phone as late as possible, their brains absorbing more radiation than that of adults.
11. Prefer fixed line telephones rather than cordless or DECT telephones which emit radio frequencies.
12. Connect the wi-fi only when needed.
13. Avoid baby monitors near babies' heads.
14. Avoid giving a touch pad to children.
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79120
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 10973




by Christophe » 28/10/13, 20:02

Resonance, Effects of Waves on the Organism , a documentary to watch: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q1N9N3J8s8A

“This film presents the living cell in a new light.
Capable of capturing and emitting artificial and natural electromagnetic waves, it behaves like a real electronic circuit.
In a world where waves are omnipresent, this film meets experts and researchers who present their work to us and offer us new keys to understanding the effects of waves on living things. "
Attention: ARA advises you to take your time and watch this documentary in its entirety, because it is worth it!
The originality of this documentary is that it shows not only the damaging effects of electromagnetic waves but also the positive effects observed in medical and agronomic research.
Unlike other documentaries of this kind, the director's approach remains rigorously scientific and he never falls into the trap of esotericism.
At the end of the documentary, the director allows himself some philosophical reflections, without losing the credibility of the content.
So, are the waves harmful or rather beneficial?
It all depends on the intensity and quality of the waves.
Their beneficial effects are seen in an intensity range much closer to the natural level.
In our modern environment, the intensity of waves of technical origin (GSM, DECT, Wi-Fi etc.) can reach a level of a few million times higher than the natural level in which the earth evolved.
In addition, the waves of technical origins are often pulsed and particularly aggressive for the body.
Those who still believe that the effects of electromagnetic waves have not been scientifically proven are certainly very blind.
In fact, thousands of studies have established bio-physiological effects.
The wireless industry continues to confuse it by saying "No health effects have been scientifically established".
In this post, the emphasis is on health.
Indeed, our scientific model has great difficulty in establishing the effects on health in a reproducible way.
This is because the concept of health is too complex and difficult to define and not because these effects do not exist.


And to see what is at your place: electromagnetic wave sensors and detectors
0 x

Back to "Health and Prevention. Pollution, causes and effects of environmental risks "

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 298 guests