Who was "sponsored" by Pfizer?

[izentrop]

I don't know but even if they stole the idea of ​​the mRNA vaccine from Moderna who complains about it, that does not prevent the effectiveness of this type of vaccine on serious cases of covid, something you violently refute on the pretext that they have lawsuits up their sleeves.

One does not prevent the other

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

It's not "ass lawsuits", it's multiple convictions for serious offenses* and the amount of fines (paid) is more than 10 billion dollars (And more than 10 more if we add the fines of the subsidiaries of Pfizer)!!! Once again you haven't read anything...

* offenses related to security
crimes related to health
offenses related to public markets
offenses related to competition
offenses related toenvironment
breach of drug or medical equipment safety
off-label or unapproved promotion of medical products
Misrepresentation and Related Act
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act
bribes

[izentrop]

It's not "ass trials", it's multiple convictions for serious acts *

There is a trial before conviction and then

If the “criminal record” of the Pfizer group is regularly mentioned by opponents of vaccination, the other major pharmaceutical groups, whether they produce (or not) vaccines against Covid, are no more virgins of convictions.

https://www.liberation.fr/checknews/le- ... DI3SCYN3I/

Your relentlessness says a lot about your inveterate antivaxx side.

[Obamot]

Normal, since they are not reliable, they are not trusted to do quality research.
QED.
The mandarin left, but we kept the same ones at the controls, it's scandalous

Is the IHU anti-vax?

are you mentally reliable?

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

Your relentlessness says a lot about your inveterate antivaxx side.

I'm not antivax, I'm against messenger RNA vaccines. What do you have to say in order for it to print?

[izentrop]

Your relentlessness says a lot about your inveterate antivaxx side.

I'm not antivax, I'm against messenger RNA vaccines. What do you have to say in order for it to print?

as its efficacy and harmlessness have been amply demonstrated, you are.

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

Yes yes. Perfect the product. Effective like no other and above all without side effects (on mice and in vitro). Biiiieeeeeeen Coco, biiiiien...

[Obamot]

as its efficacy and harmlessness have been amply demonstrated, you are

that's good, we're still waiting for you to explain to us what the alleged 95% of Pfizer is based on! [% of what exactly?]

[Janic]

obamot

Is the IHU anti-vax?

the izLIAR too knows perfectly well that the IHU is provaxx, but not just any shit at the test stage ignoring all existing protocols.

are you mentally reliable?

Proof not! It's like asking if the Nazis who also believe in the benefits and harmlessness of their doctrine are mentally reliable!

guy

I'm not antivax... Is it necessary to tell you how to make it print?

proof that vaccine superstition is tough, despite more than a century of hindsight having demonstrated (official statistics) that no vaccine has ever prevented epidemics. So this one or any other: where is the difference?

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

As much as I am not antivax, as much as I am for freedom of conscience and therefore for everyone's free choice.