it would be nice to stop bickering no?
On such a vital subject for the health of our children, it cannot be bickering! We write for future readers interested in the subject and who can see different opinions for a more informed choice.
This is where the shoe pinches because it is what we have been hushed for decades without any evidence.if you reason about millions of people vaccinated, the influence on health is statistically very positive.
The populations, as I have said again and again, have a visceral fear of diseases like epidemics and they need to be reassured, secure AT ALL COSTS, it doesn't matter whether it's true or not, as shown, historically, by the cases of Pasteur after Jenner. Vaccination is one of these means in question, regardless of any effectiveness, and successive governments of several industrial countries have understood this.
Now, and in a way you are not wrong ... completely, it is that a reassured individual is much better armed on the immune level than someone who is anxious and afraid. It is even its one and only strong point… Not the rest as the world campaign on smallpox has shown.
And there, always, suppressing vaccinations, especially in endemic and even more epidemic periods, de-securing people and raising their anxiety, decreases their immunity and cases explode in a vicious circle: no vaccines = increase in pathologies; more vaccines = fewer pathologies… in theory, but it is not so simple because we are no longer in mechanistic physics, but in the field of life and its complexity.
Are these cases constantly increasing, like autism? So on the contrary! Without vaccines, no more cases of post-vaccine pathologies, it's obvious and therefore no more contestation! What is the main argument of the current medical system: look at the victims of diseases! Do you want this to happen to you and especially that it happens to your children? With shocking and terrifying forceful images. The famous carrot or stick that has always worked!if you reason about the few cases of vaccinated people who develop a vaccine problem, it is something else.
So what to do? Otherwise do the same by showing THE SAME terrifying images, but coming from vaccine victims (censored, they, by the system in place, but identified by associations of victims [*]). And this is where the official system is screwed up, because it shows that thanks to it, the cases have decreased drastically (which the official statistics completely deny when studied closely) and that the parents no longer have to be afraid, but that they should not believe the carriers of bad news of "anti-vaccines" which show only rare exceptional cases and the good public, naive, (and especially disinformed) prefers to believe a reassuring speech that An anxiety-provoking speech is human. It is the case of ecology, nuclear, where successive governments wanted to be reassuring until Chernobyl and other greenhouse effects that can no longer be hidden or denied, with measures too late.
When we adopt authoritarian, mandatory measures, without realizing the consequences, there is no longer any need to have debates, as the minister said and repeats.The whole debate is here ...
We "anti", are not at all anti except on a personal level: I do not smoke, I do not consume alcohol, nor meat by choice of conscience, but I am opposed to a ban on these products because each individual must, in conscience, make their life choices, but I would fight with all my strength and means if they wanted to impose them on me under any pretext can for the sole purpose of making profits to industrialists.
I understand you, I am a father and a grandfather and walking against the current is a difficult choice because we find ourselves alone in front of a huge authoritarian apparatus which cannot bear any contradiction.Personally I was to maintain the DT-Polyo and not to make hexavalent, then 11-valents compulsory, especially on very small babies whose immune system is fragile.
All we can hope for is that there will not be more additional victims, but the reality on the ground will unfortunately show the opposite.
For the DTP, it should be understood that it is only a policy of constraint for financial and non-health purposes. Indeed, supposing that the polio vaccine is useful, even necessary: what does this one do with diphtheria and tetanus in this case? Could this cocktail be more effective than polio alone? What has never been and will never be demonstrated. Now try to find a single isolated specific vaccine.
In fact, the hexavalents only prolong the system because more vaccines = more money coming in on the back of the cash cow that is the SS. The 11 vaccines are just one more step which follows CDC policy, subject to vaccine lobbies which have under their elbow 120 vaccines to distribute and spread on all continents. If tomorrow we impose 10 other vaccines, as fanciful, how will you react? The whole debate is there!
Now, to make money and only money, the overall health of populations decreases at the rate of these vaccine or drug constraints. How long and until when will populations remain passive? because "the French are calves" that we even at the slaughterhouse [*] [*], said the great Charles!
[*] REVAHB (which however is provaccines) identifies thousands of victims with serious pathologies of hepatitis B, not identified by pharmacovigilance because the doctors do not want trouble with the order of doctors and the provaccines medical system .
[*] [*] and you see what I'm talking about!
