According to AN estimate of the World Health Organization (WHO), three million lives are saved each year in the world through vaccination, able today to prevent twenty-six infectious diseases and fight diseases that remain endemic in some developing countries (measles, polio, tetanus or pertussis). http://www.senat.fr/compte-rendu-commis ... health.htmlthe mass is said and the little sentence of the mistress is off the subject of the blows.
And he clings to his lead buoy, the guy! It is remarkable such perseverance to sink! Any idiot, even before reading this report and considering its constitution, could already anticipate its content and its conclusions, Professor Dubernard just put a little pebble in the machine.
So again,
1. The WHO's investigation of cash investigation had shown that it was the governments of the acceding countries that financed this organization, and then, gradually, private funds replaced these contributions to the point, as this excerpt shows below. WHO, that the public funds are now only 7%, the rest coming from the big pharmaceutical groups that hold the WHO and therefore they make their promotions through this intermediary. (what the WHO interviewee barely contested)
Voluntary contributions
WHO's program budget is funded through a combination of assessed contributions and voluntary contributions.
Voluntary contributions come from Member States (in addition to their fixed contribution) or from various partners. In recent years, voluntary contributions have accounted for more than three quarters of the Organization's funding.
Voluntary contributions range from flexible payments to clearly designated payments. Core voluntary contributions are funds provided to WHO that are fully flexible at the program budget or at the category level, and are an important component of the WHO funding model.
Core voluntary contributions allow less well funded activities to benefit from a better flow of resources and to mitigate bottlenecks in implementation for lack of immediate funding. Improved funding flexibility is therefore a key principle of the WHO funding dialogue. Yet only 7% of all voluntary contributions for the 2014-2015 exercise were made to the core voluntary contributions account.2. An announcement is not a proof! This speaker would have just as well say 10.000 as 10.000.000, it does not cost the effects of announcement. Indeed, for a quantification to be made, it is necessary to have comparative elements scientifically established with the mastery of all the parameters concerned. But here, weird, nothing but figures balanced around without precise documents
and especially independent.
3. Previously the analysis of this same statement of the WHO had been seen:
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), 2 to 3 million lives are saved each year through this simple act of prevention.
This figure is impossible to prove because it would require a comparison, all things being equal, with an unvaccinated population, which in our regions becomes difficult or impossible to find. As for countries with health development in full change, the level of general hygiene (a simple act of prevention as the current messages on the media for the flu) is increasing and thus drastically reduces infections and epidemics. WHO has largely emphasized and recognized before being snapped up by private interests and mainly the labs (investigation of Elise Lucet mediatized on FR2) who make from there then their own promotion!
4. Because as your text begins, it is only a question of
UNE only study (paid by whom?)
5. Your holes of memory make you forget this:
Also note the position of the national college of general teachers (swindlers then in the opinion of Izentrop on Joyeux): " the vaccination obligation is a simplistic and inappropriate position, there is no scientific evidence to show that this measure leads to better protection, especially for children. It is to be feared that its authoritarian nature reinforces the mistrust and suspicion of a growing part of the population "
National College of General Practitioners Teachers "how to improve immunization coverage: consultations or obligations? »27 June 20176.
thanks to vaccination, able today to prevent twenty-six infectious diseases and fight diseases that remain endemic in some developing countries (measles, polio, tetanus or pertussis).Since when are measles, tetanus, polio, rubella and mumps endemic in France?
Now your article specifies: for endemic regions ... when we had only 10 fatal cases of measles in 10 years and that there is more diphtheria, more rubella, mumps and everything to the rider.
http://invs.santepubliquefrance.fr/fr.. ... iologiqueshttp://invs.santepubliquefrance.fr/fr.. ... iologiqueshttp://invs.santepubliquefrance.fr/Doss ... iologiquesAs shown in their graph (all there is official so) compulsory vaccination comes at a time when the number of cases had drastically dropped and therefore the vaccination is not for nothing (although they attribute to the vaccination that starts). It is here that we see that their argument is completely foolish, since according to their own literature 95% of vaccinated is needed to have sufficient protective cover, which was precisely not the case here; moreover their graph shows that they use a peak of cases to self-justify themselves whereas they could have used
an average in previous years (the vpo reached this average in 1962 as it was in 1956) and as it was also at that time that the waters, carrying the viruses, are sanitized, so more or fewer transmissions.
For the anecdote, and that other people of my generation have also known: In 1959, I spent my holidays in a Breton family that had just been installed electricity and running water (and no longer the water from the well near the manure pile), the soil was still in the dirt and the small animals came in, went out, leaving some memories in passing.
Hygiene is the first and most recognized factor in the regression of epidemics and not some ineffective and dangerous vaccines, except for the business of course!
Clear "
having reason to believe does not mean having reason to believe "of....????
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré