Understanding the covid test (serological, pcr, antigenic) of Sars-Cov2 (and its variants)

How to stay healthy and prevent risks and consequences on your health and public health. occupational disease, industrial risks (asbestos, air pollution, electromagnetic waves ...), company risk (workplace stress, overuse of drugs ...) and individual (tobacco, alcohol ...).
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 70390
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 7061

Understanding the covid test (serological, pcr, antigenic) of Sars-Cov2 (and its variants)




by Christophe » 02/07/20, 11:36

During my annual routine blood test my doctor offered me a Sars-Cov2 serological test ...

I have no symptoms but apparently there is stock so now everyone ... the test is charged 10 €.

Here are the results ... not fully understood how it worked ... my doctor told me about "residue" ???

Note also the large area of ​​uncertainty ... gray area ...

78919D61-26BA-46EC-8AB8-5F7E408E87F1.jpeg
78919D61-26BA-46EC-8AB8-5F7E408E87F1.jpeg (16.44 Kio) Consulté 5523 fois


So not being at 0.0 does that mean that we have been in contact with the virus or else?

Edit addition of a curve to better understand:

Image

Edit: addition



Edit, about variants: sante-pollution-prevention/comprendre-le-test-serologique-covid-19-sars-cov2-t16502-80.html#p453742
0 x
Do a image search or a text search - Netiquette of forum - Support him forum and his ideas, make Useful shopping ! - My new project: a twin-engine electric paramotor

izentrop
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 10417
Registration: 17/03/14, 23:42
Location: picardie
x 878
Contact :

Re: Understanding the Covid-19 Sars-Cov2 serological test




by izentrop » 02/07/20, 11:48

It is not the most reliable apparently
Serological tests make it possible to search for the presence in the blood of antibodies directed against SARS-CoV-2 (immunoglobulins type M or G (IgM / IgG)). These tests help determine if the person has been infected with the virus in the previous weeks. These tests do not allow an early diagnosis of the infection since the production of specific antibodies by the immune system takes a certain time which can vary from a few days to a few weeks. https://www.pasteur.fr/fr/espace-presse ... sars-cov-2
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 70390
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 7061

Re: Understanding the Covid-19 Sars-Cov2 serological test




by Christophe » 02/07/20, 12:19

The serological is the most reliable precisely ... obviously you have to have time to develop the anti bodies ...

The rapid test PCR does not exceed 70% reliability ...

In short you do not answer the question of how the test works (scale) ...
0 x
Do a image search or a text search - Netiquette of forum - Support him forum and his ideas, make Useful shopping ! - My new project: a twin-engine electric paramotor
izentrop
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 10417
Registration: 17/03/14, 23:42
Location: picardie
x 878
Contact :

Re: Understanding the Covid-19 Sars-Cov2 serological test




by izentrop » 02/07/20, 12:40

Phone at the lab. : Lol:
0 x
ENERC
I posted 500 messages!
I posted 500 messages!
posts: 725
Registration: 06/02/17, 15:25
x 253

Re: Understanding the Covid-19 Sars-Cov2 serological test




by ENERC » 02/07/20, 13:25

So not being at 0.0 does that mean that we have been in contact with the virus or else?

This means that the measurement is in the noise level.
I know someone who has had 0,4 without obviously being in contact with the virus.

It is the same with the igg tests on bees and wasps where the limit is also at 0,3 (for allergies)
1 x

izentrop
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 10417
Registration: 17/03/14, 23:42
Location: picardie
x 878
Contact :

Re: Understanding the Covid-19 Sars-Cov2 serological test




by izentrop » 02/07/20, 23:15

The procedure for the indirect ELISA test, that used for COVID 19.
In the end we compare the color of the sample with reference colors https://www.bioutils.ch/protocoles/14-le-test-elisa
0 x
User avatar
GuyGadebois
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6532
Registration: 24/07/19, 17:58
Location: 04
x 977

Re: Understanding the Covid-19 Sars-Cov2 serological test




by GuyGadebois » 02/07/20, 23:41

izentrop wrote:The course of the indirect ELISA test, the one used for COVID 19.
In the end we compare the color of the sample with reference colors https://www.bioutils.ch/protocoles/14-le-test-elisa

Take me out of a doubt, my good Izy ... the ELISA test is the test that earned us a thunderous "The masquerade continues" with regard to glyphosate or it is another, or, if it is the same, it is valid for the covid but not for the Monsanto poison? I admit that I get lost a bit.
gardening / deadly-monsanto-roundup-for-man-glyphosate-t7275-790.html? hilit = Elisa # p355180
0 x
“It is better to mobilize your intelligence on bullshit than to mobilize your bullshit on intelligent things. (J.Rouxel)
"By definition the cause is the product of the effect". (Tryphion)
"360 / 000 / 0,5 is 100 million and not 72 million" (AVC)
izentrop
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 10417
Registration: 17/03/14, 23:42
Location: picardie
x 878
Contact :

Re: Understanding the Covid-19 Sars-Cov2 serological test




by izentrop » 02/07/20, 23:58

GuyGadebois wrote: it is valid for the covid but not for the poison of Monsanto?
Activists do not shy away from any trickery. They have been proven to be phony https://www.lepoint.fr/societe/preuve-a ... 140_23.php ...
But this is not the subject. : Wink:
0 x
User avatar
GuyGadebois
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6532
Registration: 24/07/19, 17:58
Location: 04
x 977

Re: Understanding the Covid-19 Sars-Cov2 serological test




by GuyGadebois » 03/07/20, 00:27

izentrop wrote:
GuyGadebois wrote: it is valid for the covid but not for the poison of Monsanto?
Activists do not shy away from any trickery. They have been proven to be phony https://www.lepoint.fr/societe/preuve-a ... 140_23.php ...
But this is not the subject. : Wink:

Proven *? "We" just pretended it was proven. As for Remdesivir, like the Lancet study, like Discovery, like Recovery? Guignol 1er decided that Elisa was valid for covid but not for glyphosate ... Who does not shrink from any deceit? : Mrgreen:

* Ah ah ah ah:
http://www.journaldelenvironnement.net/ ... oux,100866 <<< Attention, dangerous activists ... : Mrgreen:
0 x
“It is better to mobilize your intelligence on bullshit than to mobilize your bullshit on intelligent things. (J.Rouxel)
"By definition the cause is the product of the effect". (Tryphion)
"360 / 000 / 0,5 is 100 million and not 72 million" (AVC)
izentrop
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 10417
Registration: 17/03/14, 23:42
Location: picardie
x 878
Contact :

Re: Understanding the Covid-19 Sars-Cov2 serological test




by izentrop » 03/07/20, 08:53

GuyGadebois wrote:Proven *? "We" just pretended it was proven.
gathered eleven people (ten farmers and a local) and had a cross-analysis of their urine carried out under the supervision of a bailiff. On November 7, the guinea pigs simultaneously took two samples of morning urine, which were sent, by bailiff and according to the required protocol, one to the German laboratory BioCheck, located in Leipzig and which carried out all the analyzes of the "Voluntary pissers", the other at the Labocea laboratory in Brest, a public laboratory whose organic micropollutants service is accredited by Cofrac (French Accreditation Committee), a guarantee of scientific rigor.

I did not go to the university benches but I understand what that means irrefutable proof.

Your indoctrination is deeply rooted. : Shock: I pity you the day you wake up.
0 x


 


Back to "Health and Prevention. Pollution, causes and effects of environmental risks "

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 21 guests