Christophe wrote:Uh Obamot, reassure me ... you understood that it was CHINESE (so what? Shenists *, Taoists or even Buddhists ??) who practiced this ON Muslims FOR Muslim clients ...
* I had to search: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_ ... e_chinoise
It seemed pretty clear to me, I was talking about ethics.
No matter who did it, no matter where they belonged (why add a layer there ...) there is no justification for saying that the victims or “clients” would be / were Muslims! The beneficiaries of the organs cannot in any case pretend to be considered as such ... As for the victims, whether they were classified as Muslim is debatable, that is not the problem, it is above all human beings who have been murdered, why should they be cataloged, even though their right to protest has been taken away since they are dead. If I were one of those sacrificed, I would not want either to give the right to catalog myself, it's called respect. Respect for the dignity of the dead.
To say that it was because they were Muslims that they would have been chosen is infamous for the survivors! If I were in their place, I would feel next on the list ... Finally the ethical reasons are multiple, what is not suitable is this cataloging, it is one of the elements fueling xenophobia , it is obvious, but it seems to go unnoticed in the eyes of some!
Finally I am not sure that these nuances are well deciphered?!?!?!