The therapeutic thread of insults! Let off steam! Let go !! Band ...

[ABC2019]

ABC »26/08/21, 13:23

GuyGadeboisLeRetour wrote:

(But it is that he does not budge, the swollen bulb, the licensed swindler ...)

reported message: insults and profanity
(yes I apply the rule of the thread ).

mentally retarded!
As long as you mess around with the other threads too, you'll get the same reactions! He's even too stupid to notice that!
A little advice from non-friends: make your own forum where you can parasitize yourself by stopping pissing us off here with your incessant bullshit ... Goodbye!

reported message: insults and profanity

Reminder: no one is obliged to participate in a thread that they do not like, of course

[ABC2019]

Get off cXXXXXd!

message reported: insults and profanity.

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

Go cXXXXr! <<< It's an insult, knowing that if we don't shit, we die?

[Janic]

abcon

Reminder: no one is obliged to participate in a thread that they do not like, of course

exactly what has been said to you since you monopolized this site: Idiot!

GuyGadeboisLeRetour »26/08/21, 13:47

Go shit! <<< It's an insult, knowing that if we don't shit, we die?

as it is annoying, we do not risk anything!

[Remundo]

Good chief insulters ...

ABC is no angel, but at least try to play her little game here

afterwards I know the character, he risks well to throw a series of questions with drawers and to drown the fish under torrents of dialectic ...

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

Maiiiis, it's done, dear Raymond:

to launch a debate: do the following measures seem justified to you, and why?
* vaccination for 12-18 year olds
* vaccination under 12 years old
* the 3rd dose for certain categories of the population

Whether you are for or against, please give your arguments without insulting anyone!

[Remundo]

(But it is that he does not budge, XXXXXX ..)

reported message: insults and profanity

(yes I apply the rule of the thread ).

doomed doomed I'm cleaning up the turds and jokes ...

[Remundo]

to launch a debate: do the following measures seem justified to you, and why?
* vaccination for 12-18 year olds
* vaccination under 12 years old

NO because Benefit / risk not favorable to vaccination

* the 3rd dose for certain categories of the population

rather yes because the macchins do not seem very effective ... but it is not an enthusiastic YES either because each new dose will still be a macchin studied for 6 months ... therefore not validated in the long term.

Whether you are for or against, please give your arguments without insulting anyone!

It's done Mr. GillABC.

[Rajqawee]

* vaccination for 12-18 year olds
No, benefit / risk uncertain (since contagion depending on variant)
* vaccination under 12 years old
No more, same reasons
* the 3rd dose for certain categories of the population
In the absence of anything else, yes.

To me to add, to open (you can also answer):

- generalized vaccination over the age of 30: according to medical advice (comorbidities of course, but lifestyle, environment, and reduction in immunity can only lead to reassessment of the benefit / risk). A good example might be a vaccination for a trip abroad, for example (still in the advice)
- compulsory vaccination for certain categories of the population: no, by ethics.
-support a national initiative of the "treatment arm": HCQ, AZT, IVMC. To conclude as much as possible on these molecules, yes or no, for whom, and also to support the possibility of a treatment (new or not, expensive or not)

[ABC2019]

Go cXXXXr! <<< It's an insult, knowing that if we don't shit, we die?

reported message: insults and profanity